Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26175461›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2015

The Toxicity and Detoxifying Mechanism of Cycloxaprid and Buprofezin in Controlling Sogatella furcifera (Homoptera: Delphacidae).

Xiaoli Chang, Yongda Yuan, Tianshu Zhang, Dongsheng Wang, Xingbin Du, Xiangwen Wu, Haixia Chen, Yaozhong Chen, Yuetong Jiao, Haiyuan Teng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Plasticity in Gene Expression Patterns andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of a novel neonicotinoid insecticide cycloxaprid on earthworm, Eisenia fetida.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaoli ChangInstitute of Ecological and Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, 201403, China.
Yongda YuanInstitute of Ecological and Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, 201403, China.
Tianshu ZhangInstitute of Ecological and Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, 201403, China.
Dongsheng WangInstitute of Ecological and Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, 201403, China zb3@saas.sh.cn.
Xingbin DuInstitute of Ecological and Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, 201403, China.
Xiangwen WuDepartment of Plant Protection, Shanghai Agricultural Technology Extension and Service Center, Shanghai, 201103, China.
Haixia ChenInstitute of Ecological and Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, 201403, China.
Yaozhong ChenInstitute of Ecological and Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, 201403, China.
Yuetong JiaoInstitute of Ecological and Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, 201403, China.
Haiyuan TengInstitute of Ecological and Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, 201403, China.
Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of cycloxaprid (a modified neonicotinoid insecticide) and buprofezin (a thiadiazine insecticide) on mortality of the white-backed planthopper (WBPH), Sogatella furcifera, were determined in laboratory assays. Cycloxaprid killed WBPH nymphs and adults but buprofezin killed only nymphs, and cycloxaprid acted faster than buprofezin. One day after infestation, mortality of third-instar nymphs was >65% with cycloxaprid at 125 mg liter(-1) but was <38% with buprofezin at 148 mg liter(-1). By the 4th day after infestation, however, control of nymphs by the two insecticides was similar, and cycloxaprid at 125 mg liter(-1) caused ≥ 80% mortality of adults but buprofezin at 148 mg liter(-1) (the highest rate tested) caused almost no adult mortality. LC50 values for cycloxaprid were lowest with nymphs, intermediate with adult males, and highest with adult females. Although buprofezin was slower acting than cycloxaprid, its LC50 for nymphs 5 d after infestation was 3.79-fold lower than that of cycloxaprid. Mean carboxylesterase (CarE) specific activity of nymphal WBPH treated with cycloxaprid and buprofezin was higher than that of control, but there was no significant difference between cycloxaprid and control (no insecticide), and it was significantly higher for buprofezin than those of cycloxaprid and control. For glutathione S-transferase and mixed function oxygenase, the specific activity of nymphal WBPH treated with buprofezin was significantly higher than those of cycloxaprid and control, too.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleHemipteraHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingInsect ControlInsecticidesLethal Dose 50MaleNymphPyridinesThiadiazinesbuprofezincycloxapridHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingInsecticidesPyridinesThiadiazinesbuprofezincycloxapriddetoxifying enzymeinsecticidal activitySogatella furcifera

Identifiers

PMID26175461
PMCPMC4677492
OpenAlexW1873313435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.