Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2015
Trends in Gender Differences in Cardiac Care and Outcome After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Western Sweden: A Report From the Swedish Web System for Enhancement of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART).
Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perspectives on sex and gender inclusion in clinical practice guidelines: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Real-world management and outcomes of myocardial infarction in a transitional country: insights from an 11-year observational study of 13,099 patients.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Observational
- Narrowing sex differences in pharmacotherapy following invasive angiography for coronary artery disease between 2017 and 2024.European heart journal open · 2026Article
- Sex-Consistent Performance of an AI-Enabled ECG for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The ROMIAE Study.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Gender- and sex-dependent variations in heart failure and cardiomyopathies: a review of the literature.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of the Internet of Things for Improving Health of Non-Pregnant Women Living in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Sex-specific outcomes in myocardial infarction: a dual-cohort analysis using clinical and real-world data.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025Article
- Intersectionality of inequalities in revascularization and outcomes for acute coronary syndrome in England: nationwide linked cohort study.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2025Article
- Real-life Psychological Experiences and Cardiac Autonomic Physiology among Survivors of a Myocardial Infarction in Midlife.Research square · 2025Article
- Article
- Sex-related differences in care and prognosis in acute coronary syndrome.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Association of sociodemographic factors and comorbidity with non-receipt of medications for secondary prevention: a cohort study of 12,204 myocardial infarction survivors.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular disease in women with type 1 diabetes: a narrative review and insights from a population-based cohort analysis.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Review
- Sex differences based on the timing of invasive management among patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis.European heart journal open · 2025Article
- Sex-related outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of in-stent restenosis.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2025Observational
- Machine learning-based scoring system to predict cardiogenic shock in acute coronary syndrome.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Gender Differences in Clinical Practice Regarding Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Lipid Lowering Therapy Utilization and Lipid Goal Attainment in Women.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Outcomes of Guideline-Recommended Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Women with Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Observational
- Older women with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive or conservative management: an individual patient data meta-analysis.European heart journal open · 2024Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death for both genders. Debates are ongoing as to whether gender-specific differences in clinical course, diagnosis, and management of acute myocardial infarction (MI) exist. METHODS AND
resultsWe compared all men and women who were treated for acute MI at cardiac care units in Västra Götaland, Sweden, between January 1995 and October 2014 by obtaining data from the prospective SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-System for Enhancement of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) registry. We performed unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression analyses on complete case data and on imputed data sets. Overall, 48 118 patients (35.4% women) were diagnosed with acute MI. Women as a group had better age-adjusted prognosis than men, but this survival benefit was absent for younger women (aged <60 years) and for women with ST-segment elevation MI. Compared with men, younger women and women with ST-segment elevation MI were more likely to develop prehospital cardiogenic shock (adjusted odds ratio 1.67, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.16, P<0.001 and adjusted odds ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.48, P<0.001) and were less likely to be prescribed evidence-based treatment at discharge (P<0.001 for β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, statins, and P2Y12 antagonists). Differences in treatment between the genders did not decrease over the study period (P>0.1 for all treatments).
conclusionsWomen on average have better adjusted prognosis than men after acute MI; however, younger women and women with ST-segment elevation MI have disproportionately poor prognosis and are less likely to be prescribed evidence-based treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.