Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26174868›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016

Consolidating CCDs from multiple data sources: a modular approach.

Masoud Hosseini, Jonathan Meade, Jamie Schnitzius, Brian E Dixon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Sustainable Health Informatics: Health Informaticians as Alchemists.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Masoud HosseiniSchool of Informatics and Computing, Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University Regenstrief Institute, Inc. hosseini@umail.iu.edu.
Jonathan MeadeCreateIT, Inc., Richmond, Indiana, USA.
Jamie SchnitziusCreateIT, Inc., Richmond, Indiana, USA.
Brian E DixonRegenstrief Institute, Inc. Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health at IUPUI, Indiana University Center for Health Information and Communication, Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service CIN 13-416, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare providers sometimes receive multiple continuity of care documents (CCDs) for a single patient encompassing the patient's various encounters and medical history recorded in different information systems. It is cumbersome for providers to explore different pages of CCDs to find specific data which can be duplicated or even conflicted. This study describes initial steps toward a modular system that integrates and de-duplicates multiple CCDs into one consolidated document for viewing or processing patient-level data. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe authors developed a prototype system to consolidate and de-duplicate CCDs. The system is engineered to be scalable, extensible, and open source. Using a corpus of 150 de-identified CCDs synthetically generated from a single data source with a common vocabulary to represent 50 unique patients, the authors tested the system's performance and output. Performance was measured based on document throughput and reduction in file size and volume of data. The authors further compared the output of the system with manual consolidation and de-duplication. Testing across multiple vendor systems or implementations was not performed.

resultsAll of the input CCDs was successfully consolidated, and no data were lost. De-duplication significantly reduced the number of entries in different sections (49% in Problems, 60.6% in Medications, and 79% in Allergies) and reduced the size of the documents (57.5%) as well as the number of lines in each document (58%). The system executed at a rate of approximately 0.009-0.03 s per rule depending on the complexity of the rule. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionGiven increasing adoption and use of health information exchange (HIE) to share data and information across the care continuum, duplication of information is inevitable. A novel system designed to support automated consolidation and de-duplication of information across clinical documents as they are exchanged shows promise. Future work is needed to expand the capabilities of the system and further test it using heterogeneous vocabularies across multiple HIE scenarios.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareElectronic Health RecordsHealth Information ExchangeHealth Level SevenHumansInternetMeaningful UseMedical Record Linkageconsolidationcontinuity of care document (CCD)de-duplicationhealth information exchange (HIE)Health Level Seven (HL7)meaningful usemedical informatics

Identifiers

PMID26174868
PMCPMC11740536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.