Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26174804›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2015

Canine mammary cancer cells direct macrophages toward an intermediate activation state between M1/M2.

Breno C B Beirão, Teresa Raposo, Lisa Y Pang, David J Argyle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Metabolic Alterations in Canine Mammary Tumors.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Novel Regulatory Player in the Innate Immune System: Long Non-Coding RNAs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Breno C B BeirãoThe Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland, EH25 9RG, UK. breno.beirao@roslin.ed.ac.uk.
Teresa RaposoThe Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland, EH25 9RG, UK. teresa.raposo@roslin.ed.ac.uk.
Lisa Y PangThe Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland, EH25 9RG, UK. lisa.pang@roslin.ed.ac.uk.
David J ArgyleThe Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland, EH25 9RG, UK. david.argyle@roslin.ed.ac.uk.
University of Edinburgh · GBRoslin Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F008848/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanine mammary carcinoma is the most common cancer in female dogs and is often fatal due to the development of distance metastasis. The microenvironment of a tumour often contains abundant infiltrates of macrophages called tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs). TAMs express an activated phenotype, termed M2, which sustains proliferation of cancer cells, and has been correlated with poor clinical outcomes in human cancer patients. Cancer cells themselves have been implicated in stimulating the conversion of macrophages to a TAM with an M2 phenotype. This process has yet to be fully elucidated. Here we investigate the interplay between cancer cells and macrophages in the context of canine mammary carcinoma.

resultsWe show that cancer cells inhibit lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced macrophage activation. Further, we show that macrophage associated proteins, colony-stimulating factor (CSF)-1 and C-C motif ligand (CCL)-2, stimulate macrophages and are responsible for the effects of cancer cells on macrophages. We suggest the existence of a feedback loop between macrophages and cancer cells; while cancer cells influence the phenotype of the TAMs through CSF-1 and CCL2, the macrophages induce canine mammary cancer cells to upregulate their own expression of the receptors for CSF-1 and CCL2 and increase the cancer cellular metabolic activity. However, these cytokines in isolation induce a phenotypic state in macrophages that is between M1 and M2 phenotypes.

conclusionsOverall, our results demonstrate the extent to which canine mammary carcinoma cells influence the macrophage phenotype and the relevance of a feedback loop between these cells, involving CSF-1 and CCL2 as important mediators.

Indexed as

AnimalsChemokine CCL2Dog DiseasesDogsFemaleGene Expression RegulationLipopolysaccharidesMacrophage ActivationMacrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorMacrophagesMammary Neoplasms, AnimalM Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsTwist-Related Protein 1Chemokine CCL2LipopolysaccharidesMacrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorTwist-Related Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID26174804
PMCPMC4502937
OpenAlexW1897547428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.