Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26174082›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2016

Bone grafting material in combination with Osteogain for bone repair: a rat histomorphometric study.

Yufeng Zhang, Dai Jing, Daniel Buser, Anton Sculean, Fatiha Chandad, Richard J Miron

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yufeng ZhangThe State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) and Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. zyf@whu.edu.cn.
Dai JingThe State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) and Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Daniel BuserDepartment of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Anton SculeanDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Fatiha ChandadUniversity of Laval, Dental School, Quebec City, Canada.
Richard J MironThe State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) and Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. richard.miron@zmk.unibe.ch.
University of Bern · CHWuhan University · CNUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEnamel matrix derivative (EMD) has been successfully used for the regeneration of periodontal tissues including new cementum, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone. Combination of EMD with bone grafting materials has however generated variable clinical results. Recently, we have demonstrated that a new formulation of EMD in a liquid carrier system (Osteogain®) has improved physicochemical properties for the adsorption of EMD to a bone grafting material. The aim of the present study was to investigate the regenerative potential of Osteogain®, in combination with a bone graft, on new bone formation in a rat femur defect model. MATERIALS AND

methodsFifty-four critically sized femur defects (3 mm in diameter) were created bilaterally in 27 rats and treated following the group allocation: (1) drilled unfilled control, (2) a natural bone mineral (NBM), and (3) NBM + Osteogain®. All defects were histologically analyzed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after surgical intervention. Micro-CT analysis, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, and Safranin O staining were performed to quantify new bone formation.

resultsSignificantly more new bone formation was observed in defects treated with NBM + Osteogain® at both 4 and 8 weeks when compared to NBM alone and the control unfilled defects (P < 0.05). Histologically, the formation of more mature mineralized bone with the presence of osteocytes were found more commonly in defects treated with Osteogain® + NBM at 8 weeks post-healing when compared to NBM alone.

conclusionsThe present study demonstrate that Osteogain® in combination with a bone grafting material improves the speed and quality of new bone formation in rat osseous defects. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Future clinical research are now warranted to fully characterize the benefits of Osteogain®, a new formulation of enamel matrix proteins delivered in liquid formation when used in combination with a bone grafting material.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone SubstitutesBone TransplantationDental Enamel ProteinsFemurGuided Tissue RegenerationMaleMineralsRatsRats, WistarStaining and LabelingX-Ray MicrotomographyBio-OssBone SubstitutesDental Enamel Proteinsenamel matrix proteinsMineralsOsteogainBioOssBone grafting materialsEmdogainEnamel matrix derivative (EMD)Natural bone mineral

Identifiers

PMID26174082
OpenAlexW2210772162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.