Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26174066›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2015

Implications of Big Data for cell biology.

Kara Dolinski, Olga G Troyanskaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Simultaneous cross-evaluation of heterogeneousScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Scalability and Validation of Big Data Bioinformatics Software.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kara DolinskiLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540 dolinski@princeton.edu ogt@genomics.princeton.edu.
Olga G TroyanskayaLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540 Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540 Simons Center for Data Analysis, Simons Foundation, New York, NY 10010 dolinski@princeton.edu ogt@genomics.princeton.edu.

Funding

lntegration and Visualization of Diverse Biological DataR01GM071966 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI TROYANSKAYA, OLGA G · 2005 to 2022
$6.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Big Data" has surpassed "systems biology" and "omics" as the hottest buzzword in the biological sciences, but is there any substance behind the hype? Certainly, we have learned about various aspects of cell and molecular biology from the many individual high-throughput data sets that have been published in the past 15-20 years. These data, although useful as individual data sets, can provide much more knowledge when interrogated with Big Data approaches, such as applying integrative methods that leverage the heterogeneous data compendia in their entirety. Here we discuss the benefits and challenges of such Big Data approaches in biology and how cell and molecular biologists can best take advantage of them.

Indexed as

Molecular BiologySystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID26174066
PMCPMC4501356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.