Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26174025›Full record

ArticleHeredity2015

Establishment of a coastal fish in the Azores: recent colonisation or sudden expansion of an ancient relict population?

S Stefanni, R Castilho, M Sala-Bozano, J I Robalo, S M Francisco, R S Santos, N Marques, A Brito, V C Almada, S Mariani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

S StefanniCNR-ISSIA, Via de Marini 6, Genova, Italy.
R CastilhoCentre of Marine Sciences, CCMAR, Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
M Sala-BozanoSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland, UK.
J I RobaloMARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ISPA-IU, Lisboa, Portugal.
S M FranciscoMARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ISPA-IU, Lisboa, Portugal.
R S SantosLARSyS Associated Laboratory and Centre of IMAR of the University of the Azores, Department of Oceanography and Fisheries, Horta, Portugal.
N MarquesLARSyS Associated Laboratory and Centre of IMAR of the University of the Azores, Department of Oceanography and Fisheries, Horta, Portugal.
A BritoBIOECOMAC, Departamento de Biología Animal (Ciencias Marinas), Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands.
V C AlmadaMARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ISPA-IU, Lisboa, Portugal.
S MarianiEcosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Environment and Life Science, University of Salford, Salford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The processes and timescales associated with ocean-wide changes in the distribution of marine species have intrigued biologists since Darwin's earliest insights into biogeography. The Azores, a mid-Atlantic volcanic archipelago located >1000 km off the European continental shelf, offers ideal opportunities to investigate phylogeographic colonisation scenarios. The benthopelagic sparid fish known as the common two-banded seabream (Diplodus vulgaris) is now relatively common along the coastline of the Azores archipelago, but was virtually absent before the 1990 s. We employed a multiple genetic marker approach to test whether the successful establishment of the Azorean population derives from a recent colonisation from western continental/island populations or from the demographic explosion of an ancient relict population. Results from nuclear and mtDNA sequences show that all Atlantic and Mediterranean populations belong to the same phylogroup, though microsatellite data indicate significant genetic divergence between the Azorean sample and all other locations, as well as among Macaronesian, western Iberian and Mediterranean regions. The results from Approximate Bayesian Computation indicate that D. vulgaris has likely inhabited the Azores for ∼ 40 (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.5-83.6) to 52 (95% CI: 6.32-89.0) generations, corresponding to roughly 80-150 years, suggesting near-contemporary colonisation, followed by a more recent demographic expansion that could have been facilitated by changing climate conditions. Moreover, the lack of previous records of this species over the past century, together with the absence of lineage separation and the presence of relatively few private alleles, do not exclude the possibility of an even more recent colonisation event.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationAnimalsAtlantic OceanAzoresBayes TheoremDNA, MitochondrialGenetic MarkersGenetic VariationHaplotypesMicrosatellite RepeatsModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataPerciformesPhylogeographySequence Analysis, DNADNA, MitochondrialGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID26174025
PMCPMC4806900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.