Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26173979›Full record

ReviewJournal of anatomy2015

Prospects for regenerative medicine approaches in women's health.

Katja Schenke-Layland, Sara Y Brucker

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anatomy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katja Schenke-LaylandDepartment of Women's Health, Research Institute for Women's Health, University Hospital of the Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
Sara Y BruckerDepartment of Women's Health, Research Institute for Women's Health, University Hospital of the Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel regenerative strategies, stem cell-based therapies or the development of advanced human cell-based in vitro-manufactured preclinical test systems offer great potential to generate advances in clinical practice in the field of women's health. This review aims to provide a brief overview of the current advances in the field.

Indexed as

Women's Health46, XX Disorders of Sex DevelopmentCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCongenital AbnormalitiesEndometriosisFemaleHumansMullerian DuctsRegenerative MedicineStem Cell ResearchTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffoldscervixgenital reconstructionMayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndromestem cellstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID26173979
PMCPMC4694118
OpenAlexW1863651232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.