Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26173850›Full record

Trial reportObesity surgery2016

Self-Reported Eating Disorder Symptoms Before and After Gastric Bypass and Duodenal Switch for Super Obesity--a 5-Year Follow-Up Study.

M S Morseth, S E Hanvold, Ø Rø, H Risstad, T Mala, J Šaltytė Benth, M Engström, T Olbers, S Henjum

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bulimia nervosa in obese patients qualified for bariatric surgery - clinical picture, background and treatment.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2019
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M S MorsethOslo and Akershus University College of Applied Science, Postbox 4 St. Olavs plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway. marianne.morseth@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5681-1433
S E HanvoldDepartment of Morbid Obesity and Bariatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4959, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway. susanna@hanvold.no.
Ø RøDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. oeyvro@ous-hf.no.
H RisstadDepartment of Morbid Obesity and Bariatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4959, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway. hiriss@outlook.com.
T MalaDepartment of Morbid Obesity and Bariatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4959, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway. tommal@ous-hf.no.
J Šaltytė BenthInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Campus Ahus, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. jurate.saltyte-benth@medisin.uio.no.
M EngströmDepartment of Gastrosurgical Research and Education, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. my.engstrom@vgregion.se.
T OlbersDepartment of Gastrosurgical Research and Education, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. torsten.olbers@gu.se.
S HenjumOslo and Akershus University College of Applied Science, Postbox 4 St. Olavs plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway. sigrun.henjum@hioa.no.
Oslo University Hospital · NOOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOSahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study assessed eating disorder pathology in persons with obesity before and after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (DS), in a 5-year follow-up study.

methodsSixty participants with BMI 50-60 kg/m(2) were randomly assigned to RYGB (n = 31) or DS (n = 29). The participants completed the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) before and 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years after surgery.

resultsBefore surgery, the prevalence of objective bulimic episodes was 29 % in the RYGB group and 32 % in the DS group. The prevalence improved during the first 12 months after surgery in both groups. After 5 years, the prevalence of objective bulimic episodes was 22 % in the RYGB group and 7 % in the DS group. The difference between groups throughout follow-up was non-significant (logistic regression model). A linear mixed model showed that global EDE-Q score was not a significant predictor for weight loss after surgery, but participants reporting objective bulimic episodes before surgery had significantly lower BMI than those with no episodes after 2 years (p = 0.042) and 5 years (p = 0.013). Global EDE-Q score was significantly lower in the DS group after 5 years (p = 0.009) (linear mixed model).

conclusionsObjective bulimic episodes but not global EDE-Q score before surgery predicted greater weight loss after RYGB and DS. The DS group had a significantly lower global EDE-Q score than the RYGB group 5 years after surgery.

Indexed as

Biliopancreatic DiversionGastric BypassAdultDuodenumFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidRetrospective StudiesSelf ReportWeight LossYoung AdultBMIBulimic episodesDuodenal switchEDE-QGastric bypassGlobal EDE-Q score

Identifiers

PMID26173850
OpenAlexW931574154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.