Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26173827›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2015

A mathematical model of salt-sensitive hypertension: the neurogenic hypothesis.

Viktoria A Averina, Hans G Othmer, Gregory D Fink, John W Osborn

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Renal sodium handling and sodium sensitivity.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2017
    Review
  17. Mechanisms of blood pressure salt sensitivity: new insights from mathematical modeling.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2017
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Viktoria A AverinaDepartment of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Hans G OthmerDepartment of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Gregory D FinkDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
John W OsbornIntegrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Minnesota · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

Long-Term Neural Determinants of Cardiovascular DiseasesR01HL076312 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI OSBORN, JOHN W · 2005 to 2009
$5.6M
DYNAMIC PATTERN IN CHEMICALLY-REACTING SYSTEMSR01GM029123 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI OTHMER, HANS G · 1985 to 2018
$5.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL076312NIGMS NIH HHS GM29123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salt sensitivity of arterial pressure (salt-sensitive hypertension) is a serious global health issue. The causes of salt-sensitive hypertension are extremely complex and mathematical models can elucidate potential mechanisms that are experimentally inaccessible. Until recently, the only mathematical model for long-term control of arterial pressure was the model of Guyton and Coleman; referred to as the G-C model. The core of this model is the assumption that sodium excretion is driven by renal perfusion pressure, the so-called 'renal function curve'. Thus, the G-C model dictates that all forms of hypertension are due to a primary shift of the renal function curve to a higher operating pressure. However, several recent experimental studies in a model of hypertension produced by the combination of a high salt intake and administration of angiotensin II, the AngII-salt model, are inconsistent with the G-C model. We developed a new mathematical model that does not limit the cause of salt-sensitive hypertension solely to primary renal dysfunction. The model is the first known mathematical counterexample to the assumption that all salt-sensitive forms of hypertension require a primary shift of renal function: we show that in at least one salt-sensitive form of hypertension the requirement is not necessary. We will refer to this computational model as the 'neurogenic model'. In this Symposium Review we discuss how, despite fundamental differences between the G-C model and the neurogenic model regarding mechanisms regulating sodium excretion and vascular resistance, they generate similar haemodynamic profiles of AngII-salt hypertension. In addition, the steady-state relationships between arterial pressure and sodium excretion, a correlation that is often erroneously presented as the 'renal function curve', are also similar in both models. Our findings suggest that salt-sensitive hypertension is not due solely to renal dysfunction, as predicted by the G-C model, but may also result from neurogenic dysfunction.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalWater-Electrolyte BalanceAnimalsAutonomic Nervous SystemHumansHypertension

Identifiers

PMID26173827
PMCPMC4532527
OpenAlexW2069152309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.