Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26173803›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2015

Does introducing an immunization package of services for migrant children improve the coverage, service quality and understanding? An evidence from an intervention study among 1548 migrant children in eastern China.

Yu Hu, Shuying Luo, Xuewen Tang, Linqiao Lou, Yaping Chen, Jing Guo, Bing Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yu HuZhejiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Institute of Immunization and Prevention, No. 3399 Binsheng Road, Binjiang District, Hangzhou, P. R. China. husix@163.com.
Shuying LuoYiwu Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Institute of Immunization and Prevention, Yiwu, China. 1628865370@qq.com.
Xuewen TangZhejiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Institute of Immunization and Prevention, No. 3399 Binsheng Road, Binjiang District, Hangzhou, P. R. China. xwtang@cdc.zj.cn.
Linqiao LouYiwu Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Institute of Immunization and Prevention, Yiwu, China. 270638022@qq.com.
Yaping ChenZhejiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Institute of Immunization and Prevention, No. 3399 Binsheng Road, Binjiang District, Hangzhou, P. R. China. ypchen@cdc.zj.cn.
Jing GuoZhejiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Institute of Immunization and Prevention, No. 3399 Binsheng Road, Binjiang District, Hangzhou, P. R. China. jguo@cdc.zj.cn.
Bing ZhangZhejiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Institute of Immunization and Prevention, No. 3399 Binsheng Road, Binjiang District, Hangzhou, P. R. China. bzhang@cdc.zj.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn EPI (Expanded Program on Immunization) intervention package was implemented from October 2011 to May 2014 among migrant children in Yiwu, east China. This study aimed to evaluate its impacts on vaccination coverage, maternal understanding of EPI and the local immunization service performance.

methodsA pre- and post-test design was used. The EPI intervention package included: (1) extending the EPI service time and increasing the frequency of vaccination service; (2) training program for vaccinators; (3) developing a screening tool to identify vaccination demands among migrant clinic attendants; (4) Social mobilization for immunization. Data were obtained from random sampling investigations, vaccination service statistics and qualitative interviews with vaccinators and mothers of migrant children. The analysis of quantitative data was based on a "before and after" evaluation and qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis.

resultsThe immunization registration (records kept by immunization clinics) rate increased from 87.4 to 91.9% (P = 0.016) after implementation of the EPI intervention package and the EPI card holding (EPI card kept by caregivers) rate increased from 90.9 to 95.6% (P = 0.003). The coverage of fully immunized increased from 71.5 to 88.6% for migrant children aged 1-4 years (P < 0.001) and increased from 42.2 to 80.5% for migrant children aged 2-4 years (P < 0.001). The correct response rates on valid doses and management of adverse events among vaccinators were over 90% after training. The correct response rates on immunization among mothers of migrant children were 86.8-99.3% after interventions.

conclusionOur study showed a substantial improvement in vaccination coverage among migrant children in Yiwu after implementation of the EPI intervention package. Further studies are needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the interventions, to identify individual interventions that make the biggest contribution to coverage, and to examine the sustainability of the interventions within the existing vaccination service delivery system in a larger scale settings or in a longer term.

Indexed as

Transients and MigrantsAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChild, PreschoolChinaFemaleHumansImmunization ProgramsInfantInservice TrainingMass ScreeningMothersTime FactorsVaccination

Identifiers

PMID26173803
PMCPMC4501193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.