Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26173795›Full record

ArticleInternational dental journal2015

Indian patients' attitudes towards chairside screening in a dental setting for medical conditions.

Kaustubh Sansare, Mamta Raghav, Abhiram Kasbe, Freny Karjodkar, Neeraj Sharma, Ambika Gupta, Harneet Singh, Asha Iyengar, Seema Patil, Sanarpalayam C Selvamuthukumar and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International dental journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kaustubh SansareNair Hospital Dental College, Mumbai, India.
Mamta RaghavGovernment Dental College, Aurangabad, India.
Abhiram KasbeTopiwala National Medical College, Mumbai, India.
Freny KarjodkarNair Hospital Dental College, Mumbai, India.
Neeraj SharmaDr. Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences & Hospital, Punjab University, Chandigarh, India.
Ambika GuptaPostgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak, India.
Harneet SinghPostgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak, India.
Asha IyengarRashtreeya Vidyalaya Dental College, Bangalore, India.
Seema PatilRashtreeya Vidyalaya Dental College, Bangalore, India.
Sanarpalayam C SelvamuthukumarThai Mogambikai Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India.
Chandrasekaran KrithikaThai Mogambikai Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India.
Michael GlickSchool of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Barbara L GreenbergDepartment of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Health Sciences and Practice, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndia has a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes mellitus (DM), tuberculosis (TB), human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune-deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) and hepatitis B. United States-based studies indicate provider and patient support for medical screening in the dental setting. We assessed patient attitudes towards, and willingness to participate in, medical screening in the dental setting in India.

methodA 5-point Likert scale survey (with scores ranging from 1=very important/willing to 5=very unimportant/unwilling) was given to a convenience sample of adult patients visiting five university-based dental clinics (clinic group) and one private-practice setting (private group). The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare mean response scores between patient groups. Logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with a favourable outcome.

resultsBoth patient groups felt it important for dentists to identify increased risk for medical conditions (89.3% vs. 94.9%, respectively; P=0.02). The majority of patients were willing to have a dentist screen for the specified conditions: CVD (80.6% clinic and 84.5% private); DM (84.5% clinic and 77.5% private); TB (76.7% clinic and 73.2% private); hepatitis (73.3% clinic and 67.5% private); and HIV/AIDS (71.0% clinic and 70.5% private). The majority of patients were willing to participate in chairside screening that yielded immediate results (84.6% clinic and 86.1% private), discuss results immediately (85.8% clinic and 87.2% private) and pay 150 Indian rupees (55.9% clinic and 91.7% private). Younger patients (<40 years of age) were significantly less likely to respond favourably to: importance of medical screening in dental settings [adjusted odds ratio (OR)=0.63; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.26-0.84] and be available for screening that yielded immediate results (adjusted OR=0.63; 95% CI: 0.40-0.99).

conclusionsIndian dental patients were in favour of chairside medical screening.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthChronic DiseaseDentistsAcquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAdultAgedAge FactorsCardiovascular DiseasesDental ClinicsDiabetes MellitusFemaleHepatitis BHIV InfectionsHospitals, TeachingHumansIndiaattitudesdental settingMedical screening

Identifiers

PMID26173795
PMCPMC9376500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.