Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26173681›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2015

Rapid divergence and diversification of mammalian duplicate gene functions.

Raquel Assis, Doris Bachtrog

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Foxg1 and companions: Not only transcription factors.Neural regeneration research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raquel AssisDepartment of Biology, Huck Institutes of Life Sciences, Center for Medical Genomics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. rassis@psu.edu.
Doris BachtrogDepartment of Integrative Biology, Center for Theoretical Evolutionary Genomics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. dbachtrog@berkeley.edu.

Funding

The evolution of dosage compensation in DrosophilaR01GM076007 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BACHTROG, DORIS · 2006 to 2020
$3.6M
"Gene Trafficking on an Evolving X Chromosome in Drosophila"R01GM093182 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BACHTROG, DORIS · 2010 to 2017
$2.7M
Gene duplication in the evolution of novel phenotypes and human diseaseF32GM100673 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ASSIS, RAQUEL · 2012 to 2013
$74k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM100673NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM100673-02NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076007NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM076007NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093182NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM093182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene duplication provides raw material for the evolution of functional innovation. We recently developed a phylogenetic method that classifies evolutionary processes driving the retention of duplicate genes by quantifying divergence between their spatial gene expression profiles and that of their single-copy orthologous gene in a closely related sister species.

resultsHere, we apply our classification method to pairs of duplicate genes in eight mammalian genomes, using data from 11 tissues to construct spatial gene expression profiles. We find that young mammalian duplicates are often functionally conserved, and that expression divergence rapidly increases over evolutionary time. Moreover, expression divergence results in increased tissue specificity, with an overrepresentation of expression in male kidney, underrepresentation of expression in female liver, and strong underrepresentation of expression in testis. Thus, duplicate genes acquire a diversity of new tissue-specific functions outside of the testis, possibly contributing to the origin of a multitude of complex phenotypes during mammalian evolution.

conclusionsOur findings reveal that mammalian duplicate genes are initially functionally conserved, and then undergo rapid functional divergence over evolutionary time, acquiring diverse tissue-specific biological roles. These observations are in stark contrast to the much faster expression divergence and acquisition of broad housekeeping roles we previously observed in Drosophila duplicate genes. Due to the smaller effective population sizes of mammals relative to Drosophila, these analyses implicate natural selection in the functional evolution of duplicate genes.

Indexed as

Genes, DuplicateAnimalsBiological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularFemaleGene DuplicationGenomeHumansMaleMammalsOrgan SpecificityPhylogenySynteny

Identifiers

PMID26173681
PMCPMC4502564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.