Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26173548›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2016

Double-scope per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Kevin L Grimes, Haruhiro Inoue, Manabu Onimaru, Haruo Ikeda, Amarit Tansawet, Robert Bechara, Shinwa Tanaka

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Saudi Gastroenterology Association (SGA) clinical care pathway and standards of care for peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in achalasia.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Peroral endoscopic myotomy in spastic esophageal disorders: Clinical outcomes and optimal approaches.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Phase concept: Novel dynamic endoscopic assessment of intramural antireflux mechanisms (with video).Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Updates in the Field of Submucosal Endoscopy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. POEM, GPOEM, and ZPOEM.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kevin L GrimesDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Toyosu 5-1-38, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8577, Japan. kevin.grimes@gmail.com.
Haruhiro InoueDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Toyosu 5-1-38, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8577, Japan.
Manabu OnimaruDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Toyosu 5-1-38, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8577, Japan.
Haruo IkedaDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Toyosu 5-1-38, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8577, Japan.
Amarit TansawetFaculty of Medicine, Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Robert BecharaDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Toyosu 5-1-38, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8577, Japan.
Shinwa TanakaDepartment of Endoscopy, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince its introduction in 2010, per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has offered an alternative to laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of achalasia. A gastric myotomy length of 3 cm has been recommended; however, it can be difficult to ensure that adequate submucosal dissection has been performed during the procedure. Commonly accepted endoscopic markers of the gastric side can be inaccurate, particularly in patients with prior endoscopic treatments, such as balloon dilation or Botox injection of the lower esophageal sphincter. We hypothesized that the use of a second endoscope would result in a more complete gastric myotomy.

methodsOne hundred consecutive achalasia patients were randomized into single- and double-scope POEM groups. In the treatment group, a second endoscope was used to obtain a retroflexed view of the gastric cardia, while the dissecting scope transilluminated from the end of the submucosal tunnel. Prospectively collected data were analyzed, including myotomy lengths, procedure times, adverse events, and clinical outcomes.

resultsPOEM was completed with high rates of technical (98-100%) and clinical success (93-97%) in both groups, with a low rate of serious adverse events (2%). The second endoscope resulted in a 17 min increase in procedure time (94 vs. 77 min), myotomy extension in 34% of cases, and an increase in the average gastric myotomy length from 2.6 to 3.2 cm (p = 0.01).

conclusionA second endoscope is useful for ensuring a complete gastric myotomy during POEM. With minimal increase in procedure time and no increase in morbidity, it may be particularly useful in cases of sigmoid esophagus or otherwise altered anatomy that makes identification of the gastroesophageal junction difficult.

Indexed as

EsophagoscopesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildDissectionEquipment DesignEsophageal AchalasiaEsophageal Sphincter, LowerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMouthNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryAchalasiaGI endoscopyPer oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)Therapeutic endoscopy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.