ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2015
The Selling of Primary Care 2015.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Primary Care Workforce Training Pipeline Has Two Ends.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Exploring Models of Exposure to Primary Care Careers in Training: a Narrative Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Review
- Characteristics of the modern-day physician house call.Medicine · 2019Observational
- Primary Care Tracks in Medical Schools.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2019Article
- Continuity of Care in Resident Outpatient Clinics: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Journal of graduate medical education · 2018Article
- Meeting the demand of the future: a curriculum to stimulate interest in careers in primary care internal medicine.Medical education online · 2017Article
- Hostility During Training: Historical Roots of Primary Care Disparagement.Annals of family medicine · 2016Article
- Training for Careers in Primary Care: Time for Attention to Culture.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015Article
- Revitalizing Primary Care, Part 1: Root Causes of Primary Care's Problems.Annals of family medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of undergraduate medical education in creating, perpetuating, and potentially solving the physician shortage in adult primary care has been debated for years, but often the discussions revolve around overly simplistic notions of supply and demand. The supply is curtailed, it is said, because the work is hard and the pay is low relative to other career options. Missing is a recognition that medical schools make choices in developing primary care learning environments that profoundly affect student perceptions of this career. Emerging developments in healthcare, including the transformation of academic health centers into integrated health systems that enter into risk-based contracts, may provide an opportunity to re-direct discussions about primary care. More schools may begin to recognize that they can control the quality of primary care teaching environments, and that doing so will help them achieve excellence in education and compete in the new marketplace. The selling of primary care to medical schools may be the first step in primary care selling itself to medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.