Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26173418›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2015

Usefulness of MR arthrography of the hip with leg traction in the evaluation of ligamentum teres injuries.

Luis Cerezal, Luis Pérez Carro, Javier Llorca, Moisés Fernández-Hernando, Eva Llopis, Juan Antonio Montero, Ana Canga

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. CLINICAL RELEVANCE of the LIGAMENTUM TERES: A LITERATURE REVIEW.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Elbow MR arthrography with traction.The British journal of radiology · 2016
    Article
  8. What the Papers Say.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2015
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Ligamentum teres tendinopathy and tears.Muscles, ligaments and tendons journal
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luis CerezalDepartment of Radiology, Diagnóstico Médico Cantabria, Calle Castilla 6 Bajo, 39002, Santander, Cantabria, Spain. lcerezal@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4934-0255
Luis Pérez CarroLearnig Trauma Med. Centro de Consultas Médicas CCM, Orthopedic Surgery department, Santander, Spain.
Javier LlorcaUniversity of Cantabria - IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.
Moisés Fernández-HernandoDepartment of Radiology, Diagnóstico Médico Cantabria, Calle Castilla 6 Bajo, 39002, Santander, Cantabria, Spain.
Eva LlopisDepartment of Radiology, Alzira Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Juan Antonio MonteroAnatomy and Cell Biology, Cantabria University, Santander, Spain.
Ana CangaAnatomy and Cell Biology, Cantabria University, Santander, Spain.
Universidad de Cantabria · ESHospital de La Ribera · ESServicio Cántabro de Salud · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography of the hip with leg traction in the evaluation of ligamentum teres lesions and to evaluate whether there is increased articular distraction, possibly indicating secondary instability, in hips with ligamentum teres injuries. MATERIALS AND

methodsInstitutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained for this retrospective study. MR arthrograms of the hip with leg traction of 184 consecutive patients, including 108 men (mean age, 32.6 years; range, 19-53 years) and 76 women (mean age, 38.5 years; range, 18-56 years), who underwent hip arthroscopy were assessed for the presence of ligamentum teres lesions. The MR arthrographic findings were independently assessed by two radiologists who were blinded to the arthroscopic results. The inclusion criteria stipulated no previous surgery, arthroscopy within 1 month after MR arthrography, and availability of a detailed surgical report with ligamentum teres findings. The arthroscopy findings served as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and K statistics for interobserver and intraobserver agreement were calculated.

resultsAt arthroscopy, 32 ligamentum teres injuries were found. The ligamentum teres was normal in 152 (82.6%) patients and had suffered low-grade partial tears in 15 (8.1%) patients, high-grade partial tears in 10 (5.4%) patients, and complete ruptures in 7 (3.8%) patients. MR arthrography with axial traction demonstrated moderate sensitivity and high specificity for both low-grade (62/93%) and high-grade (66/96%) partial tears. Grouping low- and high-grade partial tears increased the diagnostic performance of MR arthrography, yielding a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 95%. For complete ligamentum teres tears, MR arthrography with leg traction demonstrated high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (98%). Articular distraction was significantly increased in patients with complete ruptures of the ligamentum teres (p = 0.001).

conclusionMR arthrography with leg traction offers accurate diagnosis of ligamentum teres injuries. Patients with complete tears of the ligamentum teres exhibit increased articular distraction that may indicate secondary hip instability.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingTractionAdolescentAdultArthrographyFemaleHip InjuriesHip JointHumansLegMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesRound LigamentsHip arthroscopyHip injuriesHip painInstabilityLigamentum teresLigamentum teres pathologyMR arthrography

Identifiers

PMID26173418
OpenAlexW1162623862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.