Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26173113›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Biogeography of Mediterranean Hotspot Biodiversity: Re-Evaluating the 'Tertiary Relict' Hypothesis of Macaronesian Laurel Forests.

Paulina Kondraskov, Nicole Schütz, Christina Schüßler, Miguel Menezes de Sequeira, Arnoldo Santos Guerra, Juli Caujapé-Castells, Ruth Jaén-Molina, Águedo Marrero-Rodríguez, Marcus A Koch, Peter Linder and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Paulina KondraskovBotany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany; Dept. Biodiversity und Plant Systematics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nicole SchützBotany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Christina SchüßlerBotany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany; Dept. Biodiversity und Plant Systematics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Miguel Menezes de SequeiraUniversidade da Madeira, Centro de Ciências da Vida, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal.
Arnoldo Santos GuerraUnidad de Botánico (ICIA), Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, Spain.
Juli Caujapé-CastellsJardin Botanico Canario "Viera y Clavijo"-Unidad Asociada CSIC, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Ruth Jaén-MolinaJardin Botanico Canario "Viera y Clavijo"-Unidad Asociada CSIC, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Águedo Marrero-RodríguezJardin Botanico Canario "Viera y Clavijo"-Unidad Asociada CSIC, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Marcus A KochDept. Biodiversity und Plant Systematics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter LinderInstitute of Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Johanna Kovar-EderBotany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Mike ThivBotany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Macaronesian laurel forests (MLF) are dominated by trees with a laurophyll habit comparable to evergreen humid forests which were scattered across Europe and the Mediterranean in the Paleogene and Neogene. Therefore, MLF are traditionally regarded as an old, 'Tertiary relict' vegetation type. Here we address the question if key taxa of the MLF are relictual. We evaluated the relict hypothesis consulting fossil data and analyses based on molecular phylogenies of 18 representative species. For molecular dating we used the program BEAST, for ancestral trait reconstructions BayesTraits and Lagrange to infer ancestral areas. Our molecular dating showed that the origins of four species date back to the Upper Miocene while 14 originated in the Plio-Pleistocene. This coincides with the decline of fossil laurophyllous elements in Europe since the middle Miocene. Ancestral trait and area reconstructions indicate that MLF evolved partly from pre-adapted taxa from the Mediterranean, Macaronesia and the tropics. According to the fossil record laurophyllous taxa existed in Macaronesia since the Plio- and Pleistocene. MLF are composed of species with a heterogeneous origin. The taxa dated to the Pleistocene are likely not 'Tertiary relicts'. Some species may be interpreted as relictual. In this case, the establishment of most species in the Plio-Pleistocene suggests that there was a massive species turnover before this time. Alternatively, MLF were largely newly assembled through global recruitment rather than surviving as relicts of a once more widespread vegetation. This process may have possibly been triggered by the intensification of the trade winds at the end of the Pliocene as indicated by proxy data.

Indexed as

BiodiversityForestsMediterranean RegionPhylogeographyTrees

Identifiers

PMID26173113
PMCPMC4501571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.