Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26173082›Full record

ReviewIUBMB life2015

Splitting the cell, building the organism: Mechanisms of cell division in metazoan embryos.

Megha Kumar, Kumari Pushpa, Sivaram V S Mylavarapu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IUBMB life, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Megha KumarLaboratory of Cellular Dynamics, Regional Centre for Biotechnology, NCR Biotech Science Cluster, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Kumari PushpaLaboratory of Cellular Dynamics, Regional Centre for Biotechnology, NCR Biotech Science Cluster, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Sivaram V S MylavarapuLaboratory of Cellular Dynamics, Regional Centre for Biotechnology, NCR Biotech Science Cluster, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Regional Centre for Biotechnology · IN

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/E/13/1/501266Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unicellular metazoan zygote undergoes a series of cell divisions that are central to its development into an embryo. Differentiation of embryonic cells leads eventually to the development of a functional adult. Fate specification of pluripotent embryonic cells occurs during the early embryonic cleavage divisions in several animals. Early development is characterized by well-known stages of embryogenesis documented across animals--morulation, blastulation, and morphogenetic processes such as gastrulation, all of which contribute to differentiation and tissue specification. Despite this broad conservation, there exist clearly discernible morphological and functional differences across early embryonic stages in metazoans. Variations in the mitotic mechanisms of early embryonic cell divisions play key roles in governing these gross differences that eventually encode developmental patterns. In this review, we discuss molecular mechanisms of both karyokinesis (nuclear division) and cytokinesis (cytoplasmic separation) during early embryonic divisions. We outline the broadly conserved molecular pathways that operate in these two stages in early embryonic mitoses. In addition, we highlight mechanistic variations in these two stages across different organisms. We finally discuss outstanding questions of interest, answers to which would illuminate the role of divergent mitotic mechanisms in shaping early animal embryogenesis.

Indexed as

Chromosome SegregationSpindle ApparatusAnimalsCell DifferentiationCytokinesisDrosophilaEmbryo, MammalianEmbryo, NonmammalianMitosisSea Urchinscytokinesisearly embryonic developmentfate specificationmetaphasemetazoamitosisspindle orientation

Identifiers

PMID26173082
PMCPMC5937677
OpenAlexW1911651432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.