Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26172284›Full record

ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2015

Resting anal pressure, not outlet obstruction or transit, predicts healthcare utilization in chronic constipation: a retrospective cohort analysis.

K Staller, K Barshop, B Kuo, A N Ananthakrishnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of Alfuzosin, an αClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Expert consensus document: Advances in the evaluation of anorectal function.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Role of Anorectal Manometry in Clinical Practice.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

K StallerDivision of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
K BarshopPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
B KuoDivision of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
A N AnanthakrishnanDivision of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Genetic predictors of anti-TNF treatment response and infections in IBDK23DK097142 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ANANTHAKRISHNAN, ASHWIN N · 2012 to 2016
$846k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK097142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic constipation is common and exerts a considerable burden on health-related quality of life and healthcare resource utilization. Anorectal manometry (ARM) and colonic transit testing have allowed classification of subtypes of constipation, raising promise of targeted treatments. There has been limited study of the correlation between physiological parameters and healthcare utilization.

methodsAll patients undergoing ARM and colonic transit testing for chronic constipation at two tertiary care centers from 2000 to 2014 were included in this retrospective study. Our primary outcomes included number of constipation-related and gastroenterology visits per year. Multivariate linear regression adjusting for confounders defined independent effect of measures of colonic and anorectal function on healthcare utilization. KEY

resultsOur study included 612 patients with chronic constipation. More than 50% (n = 333) of patients had outlet obstruction by means of balloon expulsion testing and 43.5% (n = 266) had slow colonic transit. On unadjusted analysis, outlet obstruction (1.98 vs 1.68), slow transit (2.40 vs 2.07) and high resting anal pressure (2.16 vs 1.76) were all associated with greater constipation-related visits/year compared to patients without each of those parameters (p < 0.05 for all). Outlet obstruction and high resting anal pressure were also associated with greater number of gastroenterology visits/year. After multivariate adjustment, high resting anal pressure was the only independent predictor of increased constipation-related visits/year (p = 0.02) and gastroenterology visits/year (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Among patients with chronic constipation, high resting anal pressure, rather than outlet obstruction or slow transit, predicts healthcare resource utilization.

Indexed as

ConstipationAdultAnal CanalChronic DiseaseFemaleGastrointestinal TransitHumansMaleManometryMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRetrospective Studiesanorectal manometrychronic constipationresting anal pressureutilization

Identifiers

PMID26172284
PMCPMC4584201
OpenAlexW1583191248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.