Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26172152›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Virtual and In Vitro Screens Reveal a Potential Pharmacophore that Avoids the Fibrillization of Aβ1-42.

Maricarmen Hernández-Rodríguez, José Correa-Basurto, María Inés Nicolás-Vázquez, René Miranda-Ruvalcaba, Claudia Guadalupe Benítez-Cardoza, Aldo Arturo Reséndiz-Albor, Juan Vicente Méndez-Méndez, Martha C Rosales-Hernández

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maricarmen Hernández-RodríguezLaboratorio de Modelado Molecular y Diseño de Fármacos, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis y Díaz Mirón S/N, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, México D.F., México; Laboratorio de Biofísica y Biocatálisis, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis y Díaz Mirón S/N, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, México D.F., México.
José Correa-BasurtoLaboratorio de Modelado Molecular y Diseño de Fármacos, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis y Díaz Mirón S/N, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, México D.F., México.
María Inés Nicolás-VázquezQuimica inorgánica-orgánica del Departamento de Ciencias Químicas, de la Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán Campo 1, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida 1o de Mayo S/N, Santa María las Torres, Cuautitlán Izcalli, Estado de México, México.
René Miranda-RuvalcabaQuimica inorgánica-orgánica del Departamento de Ciencias Químicas, de la Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán Campo 1, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida 1o de Mayo S/N, Santa María las Torres, Cuautitlán Izcalli, Estado de México, México.
Claudia Guadalupe Benítez-CardozaLaboratorio de Investigación Bioquímica, Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Escuela Nacional de Medicina y Homeopatía, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Guillermo Massieu H 239, Gustavo A. Madero, La Escalera, México D.F., México.
Aldo Arturo Reséndiz-AlborLaboratorio de Investigación en Inmunología., Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis y Díaz Mirón S/N, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, México D.F., México.
Juan Vicente Méndez-MéndezCentro de Nanociencias y Micro y Nanotecnología, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Luis Enrique Erro S/N, U. Prof Adolfo López Mateos, Gustavo A. Madero, México D.F., México.
Martha C Rosales-HernándezLaboratorio de Biofísica y Biocatálisis, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis y Díaz Mirón S/N, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, México D.F., México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the multiple factors that induce Alzheimer's disease, aggregation of the amyloid β peptide (Aβ) is considered the most important due to the ability of the 42-amino acid Aβ peptides (Aβ1-42) to form oligomers and fibrils, which constitute Aβ pathological aggregates. For this reason, the development of inhibitors of Aβ1-42 pathological aggregation represents a field of research interest. Several Aβ1-42 fibrillization inhibitors possess tertiary amine and aromatic moieties. In the present study, we selected 26 compounds containing tertiary amine and aromatic moieties with or without substituents and performed theoretical studies that allowed us to select four compounds according to their free energy values for Aβ1-42 in α-helix (Aβ-α), random coil (Aβ-RC) and β-sheet (Aβ-β) conformations. Docking studies revealed that compound 5 had a higher affinity for Aβ-α and Aβ-RC than the other compounds. In vitro, this compound was able to abolish Thioflavin T fluorescence and favored an RC conformation of Aβ1-42 in circular dichroism studies, resulting in the formation of amorphous aggregates as shown by atomic force microscopy. The results obtained from quantum studies allowed us to identify a possible pharmacophore that can be used to design Aβ1-42 aggregation inhibitors. In conclusion, compounds with higher affinity for Aβ-α and Aβ-RC prevented the formation of oligomeric species.

Indexed as

AminesAmyloid beta-PeptidesDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationPeptide FragmentsProtein MultimerizationProtein Structure, SecondarySmall Molecule LibrariesThermodynamicsUser-Computer InterfaceAminesAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)LigandsPeptide FragmentsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID26172152
PMCPMC4501547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.