Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26171215›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2015

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zexin Lin, Yilin Yang, Yongliang Huang, Junjie Liang, Fang Lu, Xuejun Lao

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Liver Cancer Immunity.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zexin LinDepartment of General Surgery, The First Clinical Medicine School of Jinan University, Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Yilin YangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Clinical Medicine School of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Yongliang HuangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Clinical Medicine School of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Junjie LiangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Clinical Medicine School of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Fang LuDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Clinical Medicine School of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Xuejun LaoDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Jinan University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bevacizumab has demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) when combined with chemotherapy. Several randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy and toxicity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) against bevacizumab have been reported. The present meta-analysis was conducted to identify the potentially significant benefit of the combined treatment regimens in patients with mCRC. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for the randomized controlled trials published on or before September 2014, which compared the efficacy and toxicity of VEGFR TKIs with bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in patients with mCRC. The primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were the toxicity profiles. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for response rate and adverse events (AEs) were calculated, as well as hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS. The final analysis included 4 studies comprising a total of 1,929 intent-to-treat patients with mCRC, which compared VEGFR TKIs (cediranib and axitinib) plus chemotherapy with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. Results demonstrated that VEGFR TKIs plus chemotherapy significantly resulted in a modest but significantly shorter PFS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00-1.25; P=0.05] compared with that of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy but not in OS (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.88-1.17; P=0.87) and ORR (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.85-1.05; P=0.30). VEGFR TKIs treatment showed a less favorable AE profile compared with bevacizumab, with higher rates of grade-III/IV diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, whereas a higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy associated with the bevacizumab group was observed. In conclusion, the addition of VEGFR TKIs to chemotherapy resulted in a modest but significantly shorter PFS but not in OS and ORR compared with bevacizumab. The VEGFR TKIs group showed a less favorable AE profile with higher rates of diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, whereas a higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy associated with the bevacizumab was observed.

Indexed as

advanced or metastatic colorectal cancerbevacizumabchemotherapymeta-analysisvascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID26171215
PMCPMC4486826
OpenAlexW1587577773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.