Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26171202›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2015

Association of the pri-

Cheng Fang, Hui Zeng, Anling Li, Xianqun Xu, Xinghua Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cheng FangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.
Hui ZengDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.
Anling LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.
Xianqun XuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.
Xinghua LongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, several studies regarding the association between the pri- CG/CC: OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36-0.81). Furthermore, in the subgroup analysis by cancer sites, a statistical association was identified between the rs531564 polymorphism and a decreased esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) risk (G vs. C: OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; GG vs. CC: OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34-0.84). These findings suggested that the genetic variant of rs531564 may have a potential value in decreasing cancer risk, particularly in ESCC patients.

Indexed as

cancer riskmeta-analysismicroRNApolymorphismpri-miR-124-1 rs531564

Identifiers

PMID26171202
PMCPMC4486815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.