Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26171119›Full record

ReviewOman medical journal2015

Assessment of Questionnaire Measuring Quality of Life in Menopausal Women: A Systematic Review.

Ensiyeh Jenabi, Fatemeh Shobeiri, Seyyed M M Hazavehei, Ghodratollah Roshanaei

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oman medical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05122065 (Defining the Vaginal Microbiome and the Vaginal pH of Menopausal Women With and Without Genitourinary Syndrome and With and Without Hormone Replacement Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05122065 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Defining the Vaginal Microbiome and the Vaginal pH of Menopausal Women With and Without Genitourinary Syndrome and With and Without Hormone Replacement Therapy

TypeobservationalSponsorFemTec Health Inc.Ran2021 to 2022Enrolled432ConditionsMenopause, Hormone Replacement Therapy, Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Hormone replacement therapy after surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Severity of menopausal symptoms on quality of life among working women.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Assessment of the climacteric syndrome: a narrative review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Effectiveness ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  19. Psychological Climacteric Symptoms and Attitudes toward Menopause among Emirati Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ensiyeh JenabiMother and Child Care Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Fatemeh ShobeiriMother and Child Care Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Seyyed M M HazaveheiResearch Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Ghodratollah RoshanaeiModeling of Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Menopause is a natural part of the aging process in women and is defined as occurring 12 months after the last menstrual period marking the end of menstrual cycles. Menopause has a negative impact on the quality of life (QoL). Various generic and specific questionnaires have been used for assessing different dimensions of QoL in menopausal women. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify those general and specific instruments, and to determine the factors that affect QoL in menopausal women. We assessed eight specific and three general tools and found that some general and specific instruments, such as the 36-item short form (SF-36) and the Menopause Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL), were mostly used for assessment. The specific tools available were diverse. Employment status and a high educational level in menopausal women were considered to be protective factors in improving QoL. Identification of predicting factors of QoL, such as body mass index, race, age, duration of menopause, and social and occupational variables can help to improve the QoL of these women allowing planning of psychological consultations and practical interventions.

Indexed as

PostmenopauseQuality of LifeQuestionnairesReview, SystematicWomen

Identifiers

PMID26171119
PMCPMC4459162
OpenAlexW2402031520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.