Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26171076›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2015

Growth of Secure Messaging Through a Patient Portal as a Form of Outpatient Interaction across Clinical Specialties.

R M Cronin, S E Davis, J A Shenson, Q Chen, S T Rosenbloom, G P Jackson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
23.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R M CroninVanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Biomedical Informatics , Nashville, Tennessee ; Vanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Medicine , Nashville, Tennessee ; Vanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Pediatrics , Nashville, Tennessee.
S E DavisVanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Biomedical Informatics , Nashville, Tennessee.
J A ShensonVanderbilt University Medical Center School of Medicine , Nashville, Tennessee.
Q ChenVanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Biomedical Informatics , Nashville, Tennessee ; Vanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Biostatistics , Nashville, Tennessee.
S T RosenbloomVanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Biomedical Informatics , Nashville, Tennessee ; Vanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Medicine , Nashville, Tennessee ; Vanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Pediatrics , Nashville, Tennessee.
G P JacksonVanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Biomedical Informatics , Nashville, Tennessee ; Vanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Pediatrics , Nashville, Tennessee ; Vanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Pediatric Surgery , Nashville, Tennessee.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Vanderbilt Biomedical Informatics Training ProgramT15LM007450 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Jessica S. Ancker, Bradley A. Malin · 2002 to 2026
$19.7M
NLM NIH HHS 5T15LM007450-12NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatient portals are online applications that allow patients to interact with healthcare organizations. Portal adoption is increasing, and secure messaging between patients and healthcare providers is an emerging form of outpatient interaction. Research about portals and messaging has focused on medical specialties. We characterized adoption of secure messaging and the contribution of messaging to outpatient interactions across diverse clinical specialties after broad portal deployment.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study at Vanderbilt University Medical Center examined use of patient-initiated secure messages and clinic visits in the three years following full deployment of a patient portal across adult and pediatric specialties. We measured the proportion of outpatient interactions (i.e., messages plus clinic visits) conducted through secure messaging by specialty over time. Generalized estimating equations measured the likelihood of message-based versus clinic outpatient interaction across clinical specialties.

resultsOver the study period, 2,422,114 clinic visits occurred, and 82,159 unique portal users initiated 948,428 messages to 1,924 recipients. Medicine participated in the most message exchanges (742,454 messages; 78.3% of all messages sent), followed by surgery (84,001; 8.9%) and obstetrics/gynecology (53,424; 5.6%). The proportion of outpatient interaction through messaging increased from 12.9% in 2008 to 33.0% in 2009 and 39.8% in 2010 (p<0.001). Medicine had the highest proportion of outpatient interaction conducted through messaging in 2008 (23.3% of outpatient interactions in medicine). By 2010, this proportion was highest for obstetrics/gynecology (83.4%), dermatology (71.6%), and medicine (56.7%). Growth in likelihood of message-based interaction was greater for anesthesiology, dermatology, obstetrics/gynecology, pediatrics, and psychiatry than for medicine (p<0.001).

conclusionsThis study demonstrates rapid adoption of secure messaging across diverse clinical specialties, with messaging interactions exceeding face-to-face clinic visits for some specialties. As patient portal and secure messaging adoption increase beyond medicine and primary care, research is needed to understand the implications for provider workload and patient care.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityOutpatientsAdultChildCohort StudiesDelivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsElectronic MailFemaleHumansMaleMedicineMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesconsumer health informaticspatient engagementPatient portalsecure messaging

Identifiers

PMID26171076
PMCPMC4493331
OpenAlexW2073198662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.