Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26170899›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2015

Monitoring and assessing the quality of care for youth: developing an audit tool using an expert consensus approach.

Stefanie Puszka, Tricia Nagel, Veronica Matthews, Diana Mosca, Rebecca Piovesan, Annapurna Nori, Ross Bailie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Performance Measurement in Mental Health and Addictions Systems: A Scoping Review.Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. Supplement · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefanie PuszkaMenzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT 0810 Australia.
Tricia NagelMenzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT 0810 Australia.
Veronica MatthewsMenzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT 0810 Australia.
Diana MoscaMenzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT 0810 Australia ; One21seventy, The National Centre for Quality Improvement in Indigenous Primary Health Care, PO Box 10639, Adelaide Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000 Australia.
Rebecca PiovesanWatto Purrunna Aboriginal Health Service, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, 1 Gilles Crescent, Hillcrest, SA 5086 Australia.
Annapurna NoriWatto Purrunna Aboriginal Health Service, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, 1 Gilles Crescent, Hillcrest, SA 5086 Australia.
Ross BailieMenzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT 0810 Australia ; One21seventy, The National Centre for Quality Improvement in Indigenous Primary Health Care, PO Box 10639, Adelaide Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000 Australia.
Menzies School of Health Research · AUAboriginal Health Council of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe mental health needs of young people are often inadequately met by health services. Quality improvement approaches provide a framework for measuring, assessing and improving the quality of healthcare. However, a lack of performance standards and measurement tools are an impediment to their implementation. This paper reports on the initial stages of development of a clinical audit tool for assessing the quality of primary healthcare for Australian Indigenous youth aged 12-24 including mental health services provided within primary care.

methodsAudit items were determined through review of relevant guidelines, expert reference group consensus opinion and specific inclusion criteria. Pilot testing was undertaken at four Indigenous primary healthcare services. A focus group discussion involving five staff from a health service participating in pilot testing explored user experiences of the tool.

resultsAudit items comprise key measures of processes and outcomes of care for Indigenous youth, as determined by the expert reference group. Gaps and conflicts in relevant guidelines and a lack of agreed performance indicators necessitated a tool development process that relied heavily on expert reference group advice and audit item inclusion criteria. Pilot testing and user feedback highlighted the importance of feasibility and context-specific considerations in tool development and design.

conclusionsThe youth health audit tool provides a first step in monitoring, assessing and improving the way Indigenous primary healthcare services engage with and respond to the needs of youth. Our approach offers a way forward for further development of quality measures in the absence of clearly articulated standards of care.

Indexed as

Adolescent health servicesClinical auditIndigenous healthPrimary healthcareQuality improvementQuality indicatorsStandard of care

Identifiers

PMID26170899
PMCPMC4499912
OpenAlexW2101361760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.