ArticleClinical epidemiology2015
Validity of self-reported body mass index among middle-aged participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study.
Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy and Preoperative Cachexia in Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy: Is There a "Double Jeopardy"? A National Cohort Study Investigating the Association with Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Observational
- Breastfeeding duration and maternal weight change through adulthood in a population-based cohort study.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Article
- Discrepancies between self-reporting and anthropometric measurements among middle aged and older adults in Japan: implications for health support.Journal of rural medicine : JRM · 2026Article
- Article
- Metabolic profile of biodiverse diets in a healthy European cohort.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Article
- Development, Content Validity and Usability of a Self-Assessment Instrument for the Lifestyle of Breast Cancer Survivors in Brazil.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Roles of miR-20a-5p in breast cancer based on the clinical and multi-omic (CAMO) cohort and in vitro studies.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The role of lifestyle factors in the association between education and self-reported fibromyalgia: a mediation analysis.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Replacing red and processed meat with lean or fatty fish and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in Norwegian women. The Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC): a prospective cohort study.The British journal of nutrition · 2024Article
- Associations Between Self-Rated Health and Mortality in the Norwegian Women and Cancer (NOWAC) Study.Clinical epidemiology · 2024Article
- Trajectories of body mass index in adulthood and risk of subtypes of postmenopausal breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2023Article
- Lifestyle risk factors of self-reported fibromyalgia in the Norwegian Women and Cancer (NOWAC) study.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Pre-diagnostic intake of vitamin D and incidence of colorectal cancer by anatomical subsites: the Norwegian Women and Cancer Cohort Study (NOWAC).The British journal of nutrition · 2023Article
- The association between obesity, health service use, and work productivity in Australia: a cross-sectional quantile regression analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Overall lifestyle changes in adulthood are associated with cancer incidence in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC) - a prospective cohort study.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Food processing and cancer risk in Europe: results from the prospective EPIC cohort study.The Lancet. Planetary health · 2023Article
- Maternal prenatal cholesterol levels predict offspring weight trajectories during childhood in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- The burden of colon cancer attributable to modifiable factors-The Norwegian Women and Cancer Study.International journal of cancer · 2023Article
- Self-reported and measured anthropometric variables in association with cardiometabolic markers: A Danish cohort study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Metabolically Defined Body Size Phenotypes and Risk of Endometrial Cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBody mass index (BMI) based on self-reported height and weight has been criticized as being biased because of an observed tendency for overweight and obese people to overestimate height and underestimate weight, resulting in higher misclassification for these groups. We examined the validity of BMI based on self-reported values in a sample of Norwegian women aged 44-64 years.
methodsThe study sample of 1,837 participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study self-reported height and weight, and then, within 1 year, either self-reported anthropometric again, or were measured by medical staff. Demographic and anthropometric were compared using t-tests and chi-square tests of independence. Misclassification of BMI categories was assessed by weighted Cohen's kappa and Bland-Altman plot.
resultsOn average, the two measurements were taken 8 months apart, and self-reported weight increased by 0.6 kg (P<0.05), and BMI by 0.2 kg/m(2) (P<0.05). The distribution of BMI categories did not differ between self-reported and measured values. There was substantial agreement between self-reported values and those measured by medical staff (weighted kappa 0.73). Under-reporting resulting in misclassification of BMI category was most common among overweight women (36%), but the highest proportion of extreme under-reporting was found in obese women (18% outside the 95% limits of agreement). The cumulative distribution curves for the measured and self-reported values closely followed each other, but measurements by medical staff were shifted slightly toward higher BMI values.
conclusionWhile there was substantial agreement between self-reported and measured BMI values, there was small but statistically significant under-reporting of weight and thus self-reported BMI. The tendency to under-report was largest among overweight women, while the largest degree of under-reporting was found in the obese group. Self-reported weight and height provide a valid ranking of BMI for middle-aged Norwegian women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.