ReviewIntegrated blood pressure control2015
Does home blood pressure monitoring improve patient outcomes? A systematic review comparing home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure control and patient outcomes.
Review in Integrated blood pressure control, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wireless Home Blood Pressure Monitoring With Health Coaching for Hypertension Management at a Federally Qualified Health Center: Pilot Randomized Controlled Feasibility and Acceptability Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Trial
- The Effectiveness of Home Blood Pressure on 24-Hour Blood Pressure Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial.American journal of hypertension · 2019Trial
- Assessment of photoplethysmography-based blood pressure determinations during long-term and short-term remote cardiac monitoring: the RECAMO study.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- A framework for integrating artificial intelligence for clinical care with continuous therapeutic monitoring.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Acceptability of a carbon monoxide monitoring feature of a smoking cessation mobile application: a virtual focus group study.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Observational
- How do patients experience and use home blood pressure monitoring? A qualitative analysis with UTAUT 2.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2024Article
- WATCH-BPM-Comparison of a WATCH-Type Blood Pressure Monitor with a Conventional Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor and Auscultatory Sphygmomanometry.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- National Registry of Hypertension Control Evaluated by Office and Home Measurements: The LHAR National Registry.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2023Article
- Blood Pressure Control among Adults with Hypertension at a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2023Article
- Optimization of blood pressure measurement practices for pharmacodynamic analyses of tyrosine-kinase inhibitors.Clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Home Blood Pressure Monitoring and Blood Pressure Control in Treated Hypertensives.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2022Article
- Current applications and limitations of European guidelines on blood pressure measurement: implications for clinical practice.Internal and emergency medicine · 2022Review
- Home Blood Pressure and Telemedicine: A Modern Approach for Managing Hypertension During and After COVID-19 Pandemic.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2022Review
- Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: Current Status and New Developments.American journal of hypertension · 2021Article
- Article
- Assessing the routine-practice gap for home blood pressure monitoring among Chinese adults with hypertension.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Epidemiological Impact and Clinical Consequences of Masked Hypertension: A Narrative Review.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2020Review
- Recommendations for home blood pressure monitoring in Latin American countries: A Latin American Society of Hypertension position paper.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Review
- Out-of-office blood pressure measurement for the diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy: Survey of Canadian Obstetric Medicine and Maternal Fetal Medicine specialists.Obstetric medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOur objective was to compare the clinical effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) on blood pressure (BP) control and patient outcomes.
designA systematic review was conducted. We also appraised the methodological quality of studies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (CENTRAL). INCLUSION CRITERIA: Randomized control trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, observational studies, and case-control studies published in English from any year to present that describe HBPM and 24-hour ABPM and report on systolic and/or diastolic BP and/or heart attack, stroke, kidney failure and/or all-cause mortality for adult patients. Due to the nature of the question, studies with only untreated patients were not considered.
resultsOf 1,742 titles and abstractions independently reviewed by two reviewers, 137 studies met predetermined criteria for evaluation. Nineteen studies were identified as relevant and included in the paper. The common themes were that HBPM and ABPM correlated with cardiovascular events and mortality, and targeting HBPM or ABPM resulted in similar outcomes. Associations between BP measurement type and mortality differed by study population. Both the low sensitivity of office blood pressure monitoring (OBPM) to detect optimal BP control by ABPM and the added association of HBPM with cardiovascular mortality supported the routine use of HBPM in clinical practice. There was insufficient data to determine the benefit of using HBPM as a measurement standard for BP control.
conclusionHBPM encourages patient-centered care and improves BP control and patient outcomes. Given the limited number of studies with both HBPM and ABPM, these measurement types should be incorporated into the design of randomized clinical trials within hypertensive populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.