Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26170669›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2015

Korean Medication Algorithm for Bipolar Disorder 2014: comparisons with other treatment guidelines.

Jong-Hyun Jeong, Jeong Goo Lee, Moon-Doo Kim, Inki Sohn, Se-Hoon Shim, Hee Ryung Wang, Young Sup Woo, Duk-In Jon, Jeong Seok Seo, Young-Chul Shin and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Jong-Hyun JeongDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Jeong Goo LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Haeundae Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Paik Institute for Clinical Research, Inje University, Busan, Korea ; Department of Health Science and Technology, Graduate School of Inje University, Busan, Korea.
Moon-Doo KimDepartment of Psychiatry, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea.
Inki SohnDepartment of Psychiatry, Keyo Hospital, Keyo Medical Foundation, Uiwang, Korea.
Se-Hoon ShimDepartment of Psychiatry, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Korea.
Hee Ryung WangDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Young Sup WooDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Duk-In JonDepartment of Psychiatry, Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Anyang, Korea.
Jeong Seok SeoDepartment of Psychiatry, Konkuk University Chungju Hospital, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Chungju, Korea.
Young-Chul ShinDepartment of Psychiatry, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Kyung Joon MinDepartment of Psychiatry, Chung-Ang University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
Bo-Hyun YoonDepartment of Psychiatry, Naju National Hospital, Naju, Korea.
Won-Myong BahkDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Catholic University of Korea · KRChung-Ang University Hospital · KRHallym University Sacred Heart Hospital · KRJeju National University Hospital · KRKonkuk University · KRNaju National Hospital · KROsong Medical Innovation Foundation · KRSoonchunhyang University · KRSungkyunkwan University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our goal was to compare the recommendations of the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder 2014 (KMAP-BP 2014) with other recently published guidelines for the treatment of bipolar disorder. We reviewed a total of four recently published global treatment guidelines and compared each treatment recommendation of the KMAP-BP 2014 with those in other guidelines. For the initial treatment of mania, there were no significant differences across treatment guidelines. All recommended mood stabilizer (MS) or atypical antipsychotic (AAP) monotherapy or the combination of an MS with an AAP as a first-line treatment strategy for mania. However, the KMAP-BP 2014 did not prefer monotherapy with MS or AAP for dysphoric/psychotic mania. Aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone were the first-line AAPs in nearly all of the phases of bipolar disorder across the guidelines. Most guidelines advocated newer AAPs as first-line treatment options in all phases, and lamotrigine in depressive and maintenance phases. Lithium and valproic acid were commonly used as MSs in all phases of bipolar disorder. As research evidence accumulated over time, recommendations of newer AAPs - such as asenapine, paliperidone, lurasidone, and long-acting injectable risperidone - became prominent. This comparison identifies that the treatment recommendations of the KMAP-BP 2014 are similar to those of other treatment guidelines and reflect current changes in prescription patterns for bipolar disorder based on accumulated research data. Further studies are needed to address several issues identified in our review.

Indexed as

bipolar disorderguideline comparisonKMAP-2014pharmacotherapytreatment algorithm

Identifiers

PMID26170669
PMCPMC4492647
OpenAlexW1605771472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.