Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26170667›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2015

Central nervous system toxicity of metallic nanoparticles.

Xiaoli Feng, Aijie Chen, Yanli Zhang, Jianfeng Wang, Longquan Shao, Limin Wei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Overview of Ferroptosis in Cadmium Toxicity.Biological trace element research · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Eco-friendly Synthesis ofPharmaceutical nanotechnology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Functional Nanomaterials for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Metal Nanoparticles in Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaoli FengNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Aijie ChenNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yanli ZhangNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jianfeng WangSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, People's Republic of China.
Longquan ShaoNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Limin WeiSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomaterials (NMs) are increasingly used for the therapy, diagnosis, and monitoring of disease- or drug-induced mechanisms in the human biological system. In view of their small size, after certain modifications, NMs have the capacity to bypass or cross the blood-brain barrier. Nanotechnology is particularly advantageous in the field of neurology. Examples may include the utilization of nanoparticle (NP)-based drug carriers to readily cross the blood-brain barrier to treat central nervous system (CNS) diseases, nanoscaffolds for axonal regeneration, nanoelectromechanical systems in neurological operations, and NPs in molecular imaging and CNS imaging. However, NPs can also be potentially hazardous to the CNS in terms of nano-neurotoxicity via several possible mechanisms, such as oxidative stress, autophagy, and lysosome dysfunction, and the activation of certain signaling pathways. In this review, we discuss the dual effect of NMs on the CNS and the mechanisms involved. The limitations of the current research are also discussed.

Indexed as

Central Nervous SystemHumansMetal Nanoparticlesautophagyblood–brain barriernanomaterialsneurotoxicityROS

Identifiers

PMID26170667
PMCPMC4498719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.