Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26170348›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of anaesthesia2015

Cell-based therapy for traumatic brain injury.

S Gennai, A Monsel, Q Hao, J Liu, V Gudapati, E L Barbier, J W Lee

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of anaesthesia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06163833 (MATRIx), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06163833 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

MATRIx: MesenchymAl Stromal Cells for Traumatic bRain Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei TintoriRan2023 to 2026Enrolled78ConditionsTraumatic Brain Injury With Loss of ConsciousnessArmsMesenchymal stromal cell low dosage-80*10^6 cells, Mesenchymal stromal cell low dosage-160*10^6 cells, Placebo-storage solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Non-pharmacological interventions for traumatic brain injury.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Neurological Disorders.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S GennaiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Grenoble University Hospital, La Tronche, France.
A MonselMultidisciplinary Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Q HaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave., Box 0648, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
J LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave., Box 0648, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
V GudapatiDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave., Box 0648, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
E L BarbierGrenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Unité Inserm U 836, La Tronche, France.
J W LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave., Box 0648, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA leejw@anesthesia.ucsf.edu.

Funding

Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Microvesicles for the Treatment of Acute Lung InjuryR01HL113022 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LEE, JAE WOO · 2012 to 2020
$4.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-113022NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury is a major economic burden to hospitals in terms of emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and utilization of intensive care units. Current guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injuries are primarily supportive, with an emphasis on surveillance (i.e. intracranial pressure) and preventive measures to reduce morbidity and mortality. There are no direct effective therapies available. Over the last fifteen years, pre-clinical studies in regenerative medicine utilizing cell-based therapy have generated enthusiasm as a possible treatment option for traumatic brain injury. In these studies, stem cells and progenitor cells were shown to migrate into the injured brain and proliferate, exerting protective effects through possible cell replacement, gene and protein transfer, and release of anti-inflammatory and growth factors. In this work, we reviewed the pathophysiological mechanisms of traumatic brain injury, the biological rationale for using stem cells and progenitor cells, and the results of clinical trials using cell-based therapy for traumatic brain injury. Although the benefits of cell-based therapy have been clearly demonstrated in pre-clinical studies, some questions remain regarding the biological mechanisms of repair and safety, dose, route and timing of cell delivery, which ultimately will determine its optimal clinical use.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain InjuriesClinical Trials as TopicEmbryonic Stem CellsEndothelial Progenitor CellsHumansMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMultipotent Stem CellsNeovascularization, PhysiologicNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisStem Cell Transplantationcell-based therapystem cellstraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID26170348
PMCPMC4500763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.