ArticleJournal of neural engineering2015
Impact of uncertain head tissue conductivity in the optimization of transcranial direct current stimulation for an auditory target.
Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Variation in Reported Human Head Tissue Electrical Conductivity Values.Brain topography · 2019Pooled it
- Dose-response in modulating brain function with transcranial direct current stimulation: From local to network levels.PLoS computational biology · 2023Trial
- Quasistatic approximation in neuromodulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Review
- Lattice layout and optimizer effect analysis for generating optimal transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) montages through the metaheuristic L1L1 method.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Are we really targeting and stimulating DLPFC by placing transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) electrodes over F3/F4?Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- A computational study on the optimization of transcranial temporal interfering stimulation with high-definition electrodes using unsupervised neural networks.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Bioelectromagnetism in Human Brain Research: New Applications, New Questions.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2023Review
- Comparison of EEG Source Localization Using Simplified and Anatomically Accurate Head Models in Younger and Older Adults.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2023Article
- Article
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Treatment Tool for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Extended fMRI-Guided Anodal and Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting Perilesional Areas in Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Imaging Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) with Positron Emission Tomography (PET).Brain sciences · 2020Review
- The effect of stimulation type, head modeling, and combined EEG and MEG on the source reconstruction of the somatosensory P20/N20 component.Human brain mapping · 2019Article
- Scalp-to-cortex distance of left primary motor cortex and its computational head model: Implications for personalized neuromodulation.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2019Article
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Optimization - From Physics-Based Computer Simulations to High-Fidelity Head Phantom Fabrication and Measurements.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
- Cerebellar Lobules Optimal Stimulation (CLOS): A Computational Pipeline to Optimize Cerebellar Lobule-Specific Electric Field Distribution.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Influence of Head Tissue Conductivity Uncertainties on EEG Dipole Reconstruction.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Article
- Changing head model extent affects finite element predictions of transcranial direct current stimulation distributions.Journal of neural engineering · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique to modify neural excitability. Using multi-array tDCS, we investigate the influence of inter-individually varying head tissue conductivity profiles on optimal electrode configurations for an auditory cortex stimulation. APPROACH: In order to quantify the uncertainty of the optimal electrode configurations, multi-variate generalized polynomial chaos expansions of the model solutions are used based on uncertain conductivity profiles of the compartments skin, skull, gray matter, and white matter. Stochastic measures, probability density functions, and sensitivity of the quantities of interest are investigated for each electrode and the current density at the target with the resulting stimulation protocols visualized on the head surface. MAIN
resultsWe demonstrate that the optimized stimulation protocols are only comprised of a few active electrodes, with tolerable deviations in the stimulation amplitude of the anode. However, large deviations in the order of the uncertainty in the conductivity profiles could be noted in the stimulation protocol of the compensating cathodes. Regarding these main stimulation electrodes, the stimulation protocol was most sensitive to uncertainty in skull conductivity. Finally, the probability that the current density amplitude in the auditory cortex target region is supra-threshold was below 50%. SIGNIFICANCE: The results suggest that an uncertain conductivity profile in computational models of tDCS can have a substantial influence on the prediction of optimal stimulation protocols for stimulation of the auditory cortex. The investigations carried out in this study present a possibility to predict the probability of providing a therapeutic effect with an optimized electrode system for future auditory clinical and experimental procedures of tDCS applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.