ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2015
Assessment of the treatment response of spinal meningiomas after radiosurgery focusing on serial MRI findings.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for primary intradural spinal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Review
- Stereotactic body radiotherapy for benign spinal tumors: Meningiomas, schwannomas, and neurofibromas.Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluated the response of spinal meningiomas to treatment, by monitoring changes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). MATERIALS AND
methodsSerial follow-up MRIs of 11 patients with spinal meningiomas who underwent SRS were retrospectively reviewed. Changes in tumor volume, T2 signal intensity (T2SI), and contrast enhancement were evaluated.
resultsThe mean MRI follow-up period was 46.9 months (range 13-108 months). The local tumor control rate was 100 % in overall tumor volume, although boost SRS was performed for marginal recurrence in case 8 and rapid decompression in case 5. Seven tumors showed decreased T2SI. Each of the remaining four tumors showed variable T2SIs. In most tumors, the enhancement patterns did not change. Two of three patients with en plaque type meningiomas showed increased intramedullary T2SI, thought to be due to compressive myelopathy and peritumoral edema.
conclusionsSRS resulted in successful local tumor control in all patients, although the follow-up period was not long. Changes in T2SI and contrast enhancement patterns of the tumors were evaluated on serial MRI. In addition, close follow-up with MRI is desirable to monitor intramedullary signal changes in cases of spinal meningiomas with a wider contact area with the spinal cord.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.