Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26169988›Full record

SynthesisSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2015

A systematic review of mental disorders and perpetration of domestic violence among military populations.

Kylee Trevillion, Emma Williamson, Gursimran Thandi, Rohan Borschmann, Sian Oram, Louise M Howard

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kylee TrevillionSection of Women's Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, PO31 Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. kylee.trevillion@kcl.ac.uk.
Emma WilliamsonCentre for Gender and Violence Research, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK. e.williamson@bristol.ac.uk.
Gursimran ThandiAcademic Department of Military Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 10 Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RJ, UK. gursimran.thandi@kcl.ac.uk.
Rohan BorschmannCentre for Mental Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Melbourne, 3010, Australia. rohan.borschmann@unimelb.edu.au.
Sian OramSection of Women's Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, PO31 Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. sian.oram@kcl.ac.uk.
Louise M HowardSection of Women's Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, PO31 Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. louise.howard@kcl.ac.uk.
King's College London · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-R3-12-011Department of Health RP-PG-0108-10084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMilitary populations may experience more severe forms of domestic violence than the general population. Although mental disorders are associated with domestic violence perpetration among the general population, it is not clear whether this is the case for military populations. This review aimed to establish the prevalence and odds of domestic violence perpetration among male and female military personnel with mental disorders.

methodsSystematic review: searches of eleven electronic databases were supplemented by hand searches, reference screening, citation tracking and expert recommendations.

resultsTen studies were included; nine reporting on partner violence and one on violence against an adult family member. Median prevalence estimates were calculated for partner violence perpetration among male military personnel with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); estimates on other disorders were not possible due to lack of data. 27.5 % of men with PTSD reported past year physical violence perpetration against a partner and 91.0 % reported past year psychological violence perpetration against a partner. Due to limited data, no median estimates could be calculated for female military personnel. Data from individual papers indicate increased odds of past year partner violence perpetration among male and female military personnel with depression; inconsistent findings were reported for risk of partner violence perpetration among male and female military personnel with PTSD.

conclusionsThere is some evidence that mental disorders among military personnel are associated with past year domestic violence perpetration, though current data cannot confirm direction of causality. Research is needed to inform the development of interventions targeted to reduce domestic violence perpetration among military personnel.

Indexed as

DepressionDomestic ViolenceFemaleHumansMaleMilitary PersonnelPrevalenceSpouse AbuseStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticMental disordersMilitary personnelPrevalenceReview

Identifiers

PMID26169988
OpenAlexW1761788224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.