ArticleMaternal and child health journal2015
Feasibility of Implementing a Standardized Clinical Performance Indicator to Evaluate the Quality of Obstetrical Care in British Columbia.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Monitoring childbirth and immediate postpartum care quality: A scoping review of indicators in high-income countries.PloS one · 2026Article
- Birth outcomes following cesarean delivery on maternal request: a population-based cohort study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021Article
- Effect of implementation of the MOREBMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Article
- Perinatal outcomes in multifetal pregnancy following fetal reduction.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017Article
- Safety of labour and delivery following closures of obstetric services in small community hospitals.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017Article
- Integrated Approach to Reduce Perinatal Adverse Events: Standardized Processes, Interdisciplinary Teamwork Training, and Performance Feedback.Health services research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo establish the feasibility of implementing a previously-published clinical standardized performance indicator, the Adverse Outcome Index (AOI), using routinely-collected data in a population-based perinatal database and to examine variation in the indicator over time and between hospitals.
methodsMaternal and newborn medical record data contained in the British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry, 2004-2013, were used to calculate an AOI (a composite of 10 maternal and newborn adverse events) and its severity-weighted scores, the Weighted Adverse Outcome Score and the Severity Index. Temporal trends in the indices were examined by plotting annual risks and weighted risks with 95% confidence intervals. Hospital-level risks were calculated with 95% confidence intervals, adjusting for patient case-mix.
resultsAmong 410,054 singleton deliveries in British Columbia, the risk of AOI was 5.8 per 100, while the Weighted Adverse Outcome Score and Severity Index were 1.6 and 27.4, respectively. The risk of AOI did not change significantly over the study period, while the Severity Index decreased from 29.3 (95% CI 26.7-31.9) in 2004 to 23.9 (22.0-25.8) in 2013. Fifteen of 52 hospitals had risks of AOI significantly above the provincial median. The hospitals' risks of AOI were not correlated with their Severity Indices (r = 0.02).
conclusionsThe AOI can successfully be estimated using data from a population-based database, and used to monitor trends in safety of labour and delivery over time and between hospitals. The low correlation between frequency and severity of adverse events confirms the importance of considering event severity in perinatal population health surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26169814What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.