Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26169520›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2016

Predictors of Preference for Hospice Care Among Diverse Older Adults.

John G Cagle, Michael A LaMantia, Sharon W Williams, Jolynn Pek, Lloyd J Edwards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Nursing Home End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hospice Care Preferences and Its Associated Factors among Community-Dwelling Residents in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John G CagleSchool of Social Work, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA jcagle@ssw.umaryland.edu.
Michael A LaMantiaIndiana University Center for Aging Research and Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Sharon W WilliamsGillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jolynn PekDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Lloyd J EdwardsGillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

UNC Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000083 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RUNGE, MARSCHALL S. · 2012 to 2013
$11.6M
PREDOCTORAL/POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING HLTH CARE AGING REST32AG000272 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DILWORTH-ANDERSON, PEGGYE · 2001 to 2013
$2.3M
Delirium Evaluation in the Emergency Department for Seniors (DEEDS)K23AG043498 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI LAMANTIA, MICHAEL ANDREW · 2014 to 2018
$633k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000083NIA NIH HHS K23 AG043498NIA NIH HHS L30 AG034882NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe purpose of this study was to identify predictors of preference for hospice care and explore whether the effect of these predictors on preference for hospice care were moderated by race.

methodsAn analysis of the North Carolina AARP End of Life Survey (N = 3035) was conducted using multinomial logistic modeling to identify predictors of preference for hospice care. Response options included yes, no, or don't know.

resultsFewer black respondents reported a preference for hospice (63.8% vs 79.2% for white respondents, P < .001). While the proportion of black and white respondents expressing a clear preference against hospice was nearly equal (4.5% and 4.0%, respectively), black individuals were nearly twice as likely to report a preference of "don't know" (31.5% vs 16.8%). Gender, race, age, income, knowledge of Medicare coverage of hospice, presence of an advance directive, end-of-life care concerns, and religiosity/spirituality predicted hospice care preference. Religiosity/spirituality however, was moderated by race. Race interacted with religiosity/spirituality in predicting hospice care preference such that religiosity/spirituality promoted hospice care preference among White respondents, but not black respondents.

conclusionsUncertainties about hospice among African Americans may contribute to disparities in utilization. Efforts to improve access to hospice should consider pre-existing preferences for end-of-life care and account for the complex demographic, social, and cultural factors that help shape these preferences.

Indexed as

Advance DirectivesAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBlack or African AmericanHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHospice CareHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedPatient PreferenceReligionSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Statesattitudesdisparitieshospiceolder adultssurvey researchtreatment preferences

Identifiers

PMID26169520
PMCPMC5503181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.