Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26169489›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2015

Where Does Lenalidomide Fit in Non-del(5q) MDS?

Aristoteles Giagounidis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Favorable outcomes ofEJHaem · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aristoteles GiagounidisClinic for Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Marien Hospital, Rochusstraße 2, 40479, Düsseldorf, Germany, aristoteles.giagounidis@vkkd-kliniken.de.
Marien Hospital Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lenalidomide is nowadays an accepted standard treatment for del(5q) MDS. In non-del(5q) disease, its role is more difficult ot define. Studies have shown that about 18 % of patients treated with a standard dose of 10 mg/day on 21 out of 28 days might achieve erythroid transfusion independence rates that last 6 months or longer. The responses to lenalidomide seem to be inversely correlated to the pre-treatment EPO level. The higher the EPO level, the lower the responses. In the absence of other cytogenetic or molecular predictive factors that allow to discern which patient benefit most from treatment, its incorporation into the treatment algorithm is dependent on the available alternatives, including erythropoietic agents, immunosuppressive treatments and experimental strategies like thrombopoietin receptor agonists or the antagonists of transforming growth factor beta. Given that 90 % of responses to lenalidomide occur within four months of treatment, patients not responding within this time frame should discontinue therapy.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChromosome DeletionCombined Modality TherapyHumansImmunologic FactorsIron Chelating AgentsIron OverloadLenalidomideMyelodysplastic SyndromesPatient SelectionThalidomideTreatment OutcomeImmunologic FactorsIron Chelating AgentsLenalidomideThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID26169489
OpenAlexW2176512471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.