ArticleExperimental brain research2015
Unintentional changes in the apparent stiffness of the multi-joint limb.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Force drifts and matching errors in the lower extremities: implications for the control and perception of foot force.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Towards physics of neural processes and behavior.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2016Review
- On the nature of unintentional action: a study of force/moment drifts during multifinger tasks.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
- Unintentional movements induced by sequential transient perturbations in a multi-joint positional task.Human movement science · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We explored the phenomenon of unintentional changes in the apparent stiffness of the human arm produced by transient changes in the external force. The subjects performed a positional task against a constant baseline force and were instructed not to react to changes in the force. A HapticMaster robot produced a smooth force increase (a perturbation) leading to a hand movement, followed by a dwell time. No visible hand drift was observed during the dwell time. After the robot force dropped to its initial baseline value, the hand moved toward the initial position but stopped short of it. Small perturbations were applied at different time intervals along different directions during the dwell time. Arm apparent stiffness distribution in a horizontal plane was approximated with an ellipse. The apparent stiffness magnitude along the main axis of the ellipse showed a non-monotonic increase with dwell time, while the apparent stiffness along the minor axis did not change significantly. We interpreted the early part of the changes in the apparent stiffness as due to peripheral muscle properties. The later part is interpreted as caused by a combination of two processes: a drift in the referent hand coordinate due to the hypothesized back-coupling between the referent and actual hand coordinates and an implicit instruction to keep the hand steady when no changes in robot-generated force took place. The data provide support for the idea of back-coupling between the referent and actual body configurations, which may be an important contributor to stability of motor actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.