Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26169060›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Development of a LAMP assay for detection of Leishmania infantum infection in dogs using conjunctival swab samples.

Chun-hua Gao, Dan Ding, Jun-yun Wang, Dietmar Steverding, Xia Wang, Yue-tao Yang, Feng Shi

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chun-hua GaoNational Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, Ministry of Public Health, National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, WHO Collaborating Centre for Malaria, Schistosomiasis and Filariasis, Shanghai, 200025, China. gaochunhua1976@aliyun.com.
Dan DingNational Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, Ministry of Public Health, National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, WHO Collaborating Centre for Malaria, Schistosomiasis and Filariasis, Shanghai, 200025, China. eledd123@126.com.
Jun-yun WangNational Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, Ministry of Public Health, National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, WHO Collaborating Centre for Malaria, Schistosomiasis and Filariasis, Shanghai, 200025, China. wang_junyun@yahoo.com.
Dietmar SteverdingBioMedical Research Centre, Norwich Medical School, Norwich Research Park, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK. dsteverding@hotmail.com.
Xia WangBioMedical Research Centre, Norwich Medical School, Norwich Research Park, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK. xiawang@hotmail.com.
Yue-tao YangNational Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, Ministry of Public Health, National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, WHO Collaborating Centre for Malaria, Schistosomiasis and Filariasis, Shanghai, 200025, China. yangyuetao@aliyun.com.
Feng ShiNational Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, Ministry of Public Health, National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, WHO Collaborating Centre for Malaria, Schistosomiasis and Filariasis, Shanghai, 200025, China. shifeng18sep@aliyun.com.
Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention · CNNorwich Research Park · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeishmania infantum infections in dogs play a crucial role in the transmission of pathogens causing visceral leishmaniasis to humans in the Gansu province, northwest China. To be able to control zoonotic transmission of the parasite to humans, a non-invasive loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay to specifically detect L. infantum infections in dogs was developed.

methodsThe primers used in the LAMP assay were designed to target kinetoplast DNA minicircle sequences of the L. infantum isolate MCAN/CN/90/SC and tested using DNA isolated from promastigotes of different Leishmania species. The LAMP assay was evaluated with conjunctional swab samples obtained from 111 and 33 dogs living in an endemic and a non-endemic region of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis in the Gansu province, respectively. The LAMP assay was also compared with conventional PCR, ELISA and microscopy using conjunctional swab, serum and bone marrow samples from the dogs, respectively.

resultsThe LAMP assay detected 1 fg of L. infantum DNA purified from cultured promastigotes which was 10-fold more sensitive than a conventional PCR test using Leishmania genus-specific primers. No cross reaction was observed with DNA isolated from promastigotes of L. donovani, L. major, L. tropica, and L. braziliensis, and the L. infantum reference strain MHOM/TN/80/IPT1. The L. infantum-positive rates obtained for field-collected samples were 61.3%, 58.6%, 40.5% and 10.8% by LAMP, PCR, ELISA and microscopy, respectively. As only one out of the 33 samples from control dogs from the non-endemic region of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis was positive by the LAMP assay and the PCR test, the observed true negative rate (specificity) was 97% for both methods.

conclusionThis study has shown that the non-invasive, conjunctional swab-based LAMP assay developed was more sensitive in the detection of leishmaniasis in dogs than PCR, ELISA and microscopy. The findings indicate that the LAMP assay is a sensitive and specific method for the field surveillance of domestic dogs, particularly of asymptomatic canines, in ZVL-endemic areas in western China.

Indexed as

AnimalsChinaConjunctivaDNA PrimersDog DiseasesDogsLeishmania infantumLeishmaniasis, VisceralNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesSensitivity and SpecificityDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID26169060
PMCPMC4501202
OpenAlexW1661490723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.