Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26168892›Full record

ArticleBrain research2015

Inefficient stimulus processing at encoding affects formation of high-order general representation: A study on cross-modal word-stem completion task.

Laura Sebastiani, Eleonora Castellani, Angelo Gemignani, Fiorenzo Artoni, Danilo Menicucci

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura SebastianiDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. Electronic address: lauseba@dfb.unipi.it.
Eleonora CastellaniDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Angelo GemignaniDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular & Critical Area Pathology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council (CNR), Pisa, Italy; Extreme Centre, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Fiorenzo ArtoniThe Biorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Danilo MenicucciDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITScuola Superiore Sant'Anna · IT

Funding

European Research Council 338866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Priming is an implicit memory effect in which previous exposure to one stimulus influences the response to another stimulus. The main characteristic of priming is that it occurs without awareness. Priming takes place also when the physical attributes of previously studied and test stimuli do not match; in fact, it greatly refers to a general stimulus representation activated at encoding independently of the sensory modality engaged. Our aim was to evaluate whether, in a cross-modal word-stem completion task, negative priming scores could depend on inefficient word processing at study and therefore on an altered stimulus representation. Words were presented in the auditory modality, and word-stems to be completed in the visual modality. At study, we recorded auditory ERPs, and compared the P300 (attention/memory) and N400 (meaning processing) of individuals with positive and negative priming. Besides classical averaging-based ERPs analysis, we used an ICA-based method (ErpICASSO) to separate the potentials related to different processes contributing to ERPs. Classical analysis yielded significant difference between the two waves across the whole scalp. ErpICASSO allowed separating the novelty-related P3a and the top-down control-related P3b sub-components of P300. Specifically, in the component C3, the positive deflection identifiable as P3b, was significantly greater in the positive than in the negative priming group, while the late negative deflection corresponding to the parietal N400, was reduced in the positive priming group. In conclusion, inadequacy of specific processes at encoding, such as attention and/or meaning retrieval, could generate weak semantic representations, making words less accessible in subsequent implicit retrieval.

Indexed as

ReadingSemanticsAcoustic StimulationBrainElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansLanguage TestsMaleNeuropsychological TestsPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationRepetition PrimingSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSpeechErpICASSOERPsPriming effectSemantic representationWord processing

Identifiers

PMID26168892
PMCPMC5040497
OpenAlexW820706680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.