ArticleBMC genetics2015
Fast imputation using medium or low-coverage sequence data.
Article in BMC genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genotype imputation performance in Nellore cattle across different SNP panels and software tools.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- Advances in haplotype phasing and genotype imputation.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Impact of pedigree completeness on genomic-polygenic evaluations for milk yield, fat percentage, and age at first calving in Thai multibreed dairy cattle.Archives animal breeding · 2026Article
- Haplotypes affecting stillbirth and fertility in Icelandic Dairy Cattle.Journal of applied genetics · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study of Daughter Pregnancy Rate in Crossbred Dairy Cows.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Genomic Prediction and Heritability Estimation for Daughter Pregnancy Rate in U.S. Holstein Cows Using SNP, Epistasis and Haplotype Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Low-Coverage Sequencing Strategies for Whole-Genome Imputation in Pacific AbaloneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Effect of genomic regions harboring putative lethal haplotypes on reproductive performance in closed experimental selection lines of Nellore cattle.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mutual information-based best linear unbiased prediction for enhanced genomic prediction accuracy.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Genome-wide association analysis of resistance to bacterial cold-water disease in an important rainbow trout aquaculture breeding population.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) effectively models small cattle populations: lessons from the Israeli-Holstein Herdbook.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Empirical versus estimated accuracy of imputation: optimising filtering thresholds for sequence imputation.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- A million-cow genome-wide association study of productive life in U.S. Holstein cows.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- MPH: fast REML for large-scale genome partitioning of quantitative genetic variation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- A Million-Cow Validation of a Chromosome 14 Region Interacting with All Chromosomes for Fat Percentage in U.S. Holstein Cows.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Genome-wide association analysis of heifer livability and early first calving in Holstein cattle.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Evaluating the potential of (epi)genotype-by-low pass nanopore sequencing in dairy cattle: a study on direct genomic value and methylation analysis.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Identification of candidate lethal haplotypes and genomic association with post-natal mortality and reproductive traits in Nellore cattle.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A Million-Cow Genome-Wide Association Study of Three Fertility Traits in U.S. Holstein Cows.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- SLEMM: million-scale genomic predictions with window-based SNP weighting.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate genotype imputation can greatly reduce costs and increase benefits by combining whole-genome sequence data of varying read depth and array genotypes of varying densities. For large populations, an efficient strategy chooses the two haplotypes most likely to form each genotype and updates posterior allele probabilities from prior probabilities within those two haplotypes as each individual's sequence is processed. Directly using allele read counts can improve imputation accuracy and reduce computation compared with calling or computing genotype probabilities first and then imputing.
resultsA new algorithm was implemented in findhap (version 4) software and tested using simulated bovine and actual human sequence data with different combinations of reference population size, sequence read depth and error rate. Read depths of ≥ 8× may be desired for direct investigation of sequenced individuals, but for a given total cost, sequencing more individuals at read depths of 2× to 4× gave more accurate imputation from array genotypes. Imputation accuracy improved further if reference individuals had both low-coverage sequence and high-density (HD) microarray data, and remained high even with a read error rate of 16%. With read depths of ≤4×, findhap (version 4) had higher accuracy than Beagle (version 4); computing time was up to 400 times faster with findhap than with Beagle. For 10,000 sequenced individuals plus 250 with HD array genotypes to test imputation, findhap used 7 hours, 10 processors and 50 GB of memory for 1 million loci on one chromosome. Computing times increased in proportion to population size but less than proportional to number of variants.
conclusionsSimultaneous genotype calling from low-coverage sequence data and imputation from array genotypes of various densities is done very efficiently within findhap by updating allele probabilities within the two haplotypes for each individual. Accuracy of genotype calling and imputation were high with both simulated bovine and actual human genomes reduced to low-coverage sequence and HD microarray data. More efficient imputation allows geneticists to locate and test effects of more DNA variants from more individuals and to include those in future prediction and selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.