SynthesisBMJ clinical evidence2015
Varicocele.
Synthesis in BMJ clinical evidence, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ultrasound evaluation of varicoceles: systematic literature review and rationale of the ESUR-SPIWG Guidelines and Recommendations.Journal of ultrasound · 2020Pooled it
- Male infertility due to testicular disorders.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVaricocele is estimated to affect about 15% of the general male population. It usually occurs only on the left side, and is often asymptomatic. There is little evidence that varicocele reduces male fertility, although it is found in 12% of male partners of couples presenting with infertility and in 25% of men with abnormal semen analysis. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of treatments in adult males with varicocele? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to November 2013 (Clinical Evidence overviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this overview).
resultsSearching of electronic databases retrieved 203 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 91 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 53 studies and the further review of 38 full publications. Of the 38 full articles evaluated, one existing systematic review was updated and two systematic reviews and five RCTs were added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation of nine PICO combinations.
conclusionsIn this systematic overview we categorised the efficacy for four interventions, based on information relating to the effectiveness of embolisation, expectant management, sclerotherapy, and surgical ligation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26168774PMC4500994What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.