Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26168591›Full record

ArticleMissouri medicine

Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections.

Kevin O'Rourke, Nicole Kibbee, Amy Stubbs

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Missouri medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. A Man With Abdominal Wall Fluctuance.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Imaging of MSK infections in the ER.Skeletal radiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Ultrasound of palpable lesions: a pictorial review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Diagnostics for Wound Infections.Advances in wound care · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kevin O'Rourke
Nicole Kibbee
Amy Stubbs

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin and sott tissue infections, including abscesses and cellulitides, are common problems seen by physicians. The treatment of soft tissue infections varies depending on the depth of infection or the presence of a fluid collection requiring incision and drainage. Ultrasound is a valuable tool in the evaluation of skin and soft tissue infections, enhancing our ability to diagnose an abscess cavity or deeper infection and has been shown to be more reliable than clinical exam alone. The judicious use of ultrasound allows for more appropriate patient care and management of their underlying infection. It can prevent an unnecessary procedure or identify occult abscesses that may go on to develop a more severe infection requiring hospitalization. In this article,we discuss the utility of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool for skin and soft tissue infections, techniques to optimize scanning, and the potential drawbacks of its use.

Indexed as

HumansSkinSkin Diseases, InfectiousSoft Tissue InfectionsUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID26168591
PMCPMC6170135
OpenAlexW2418815820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.