Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26168063›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of managed care2015

Higher 30-day and 60-day readmissions among patients who refuse post acute care services.

Maxim Topaz, Youjeong Kang, Diane E Holland, Brenda Ohta, Kathy Rickard, Kathryn H Bowles

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of managed care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic review of prediction models for postacute care destination decision-making.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Developing a clinical decision support framework for integrating predictive models into routine nursing practices in home health care for patients with heart failure.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Using a Decision Support Algorithm for Referrals to Post-Acute Care.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maxim Topaz
Youjeong Kang
Diane E Holland
Brenda Ohta
Kathy Rickard
Kathryn H BowlesUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail: bowles@nursing.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Factors to Support Effective Discharge Decision MakingR01NR007674 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BOWLES, KATHRYN HELENE · 2001 to 2015
$3.6M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR007674NINR NIH HHS R01-NR07674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare patients who accepted ("acceptors") post acute care services (PAC) with those who were offered services and refused ("refusers") in terms of their sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, quality of life, health-related problems, and unmet needs; and to examine the association between refusing PAC services and the risk for 30- and 60-day readmission. STUDY

designSecondary data analysis from a cross-sectional study.

methodsBivariate analysis and logistic regressions were used to examine the association between refusing PAC services and 30- and 60-day readmission.

resultsA convenience sample of 495 PAC-referred patients 55 years and older discharged from 2 large academic medical centers in the northeastern United States completed the study questionnaires, with a resulting 28% (n = 139) that refused PAC services. Refusers were significantly younger (average age 68 years vs 73 years; P < .001), as well as more likely to be married (62% vs 46%; P < .001), privately insured (35% vs 18%; P < .001), and with lower risk of mortality/severity of illness. Refusers also had shorter hospital stays (4.8 days vs 7.5 days; P < .001); higher quality of life after discharge (0.83 vs 0.73; P < .001); and fewer unmet needs after discharge. However, refusers had higher 30-day (21% vs 16%; P = .17) and 60-day (31% vs 25%; P = .18) readmission rates; with logistic regression showing about twice-higher odds of 30-day (OR [odds ratio], 2.13; 95% CI, 1.11-3.02; P = .01) and 60-day (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.11-3.02; P = .02) readmission.

conclusionsPAC refusers are younger, better educated, and healthier, but they have twice-higher odds of 30- and 60-day readmissions, compared with PAC acceptors. Further investigation into reasons for PAC refusal is critical to foster enhanced patient communication regarding PAC services, improve rates of service acceptance, and ultimately decrease readmissions.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareSubacute CareTreatment RefusalAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26168063
PMCPMC8607532
OpenAlexW2413592099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.