ReviewGastroenterology research and practice2015
Efficacy of Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass for Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Outcomes of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity.Obesity surgery · 2020Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Metabolic Operation for Patients with Body Mass Index ≤ 35 kg/mObesity surgery · 2020Pooled it
- [Evidence of the Mini-/One-anastomosis-gastric-Bypass for being a standard procedure in obesity and metabolic surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Changes of Regulatory T Cells and of Proinflammatory and Immunosuppressive Cytokines in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of diabetes research · 2016Pooled it
- LSG vs MGB-OAGB-3 Year Follow-up Data: a Randomised Control Trial.Obesity surgery · 2018Trial
- LSG vs OAGB-1 Year Follow-up Data-a Randomized Control Trial.Obesity surgery · 2017Trial
- A New Concept in Bariatric Surgery. Single Anastomosis Gastro-Ileal (SAGI): Technical Details and Preliminary Results.Obesity surgery · 2017Trial
- Revisions of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with Biliopancreatic Limb of 250 cm Multicentre Retrospective Study with a Mean Follow-up of 11 years.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- One-anastomosis gastric bypassWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- One-anastomosis gastric bypassWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- The Effect of Long Biliopancreatic Limb Versus Long Roux Versus Single Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: 5-Year Outcomes on HbA1c and Comorbidities.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Investigation of the effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass on metabolic syndrome components.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Improvement of Microvascular Function in Patients with Morbid Obesity After Bariatric Surgery Revealed by Imaging Photoplethysmography.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of One-Year Outcomes in Sleeve Gastrectomy vs. One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in a Single Bariatric Unit.Cureus · 2024Article
- Effect of different bariatric surgery methods on metabolic syndrome in patients with severe obesity.Updates in surgery · 2024Article
- OAGB with shortened excluded ileal loop as an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus in the cases of Caucasian men and women with obesity of the first degree (BMI 30-35 kg/mLangenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- One anastomosis gastric bypass surgery in Type2 diabetes patients with body mass index < 35 kg/mAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Additional gastric resection after one anastomosis gastric bypass-are there benefits?Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2022Article
- The many faces of diabetes. Is there a need for re-classification? A narrative review.BMC endocrine disorders · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background. Controversies on the utility of laparoscopic mini gastric bypass (LMGB) in weight loss and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) control still exist. Methods. We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Review Manager was used to perform the meta-analysis and the weighted mean difference (WMD) and/or odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to evaluate the overall size effect. Results. The literature search identified 16 studies for systematic review and 15 articles for meta-analysis. Compared with LAGB, LSG, and LRYGB, LMGB showed significant weight loss [WMD, -6.58 (95% CI, -9.37, -3.79), P < 0.01 (LAGB); 2.86 (95% CI, 1.40, 5.83), P = 0.004 (LSG); 10.33 (95% CI, 4.30, 16.36), P < 0.01 (LRYGB)] and comparable/higher T2DM remission results [86.2% versus 55.6%, P = 0.06 (LAGB); 89.1% versus 76.3%, P = 0.004 (LAGB); 93.4% versus 77.6%, P = 0.006 (LAGB)]; LMGB also had shorter learning curve and less operation time than LRYGB [WMD, -35.2 (95% CI, -46.94, -23.46)]. Conclusions. LMGB appeared to be effective in weight loss and T2DM remission and noninferior to other bariatric surgeries. However, clinical utility of LMGB needs to be further validated by future prospective randomized controlled trials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.