Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26167132›Full record

ReviewJournal of plant nutrition and soil science = Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenernahrung und Bodenkunde2015

Innovative methods in soil phosphorus research: A review.

Jens Kruse, Marion Abraham, Wulf Amelung, Christel Baum, Roland Bol, Oliver Kühn, Hans Lewandowski, Jörg Niederberger, Yvonne Oelmann, Christopher Rüger and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of plant nutrition and soil science = Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenernahrung und Bodenkunde, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Solvent-Free Synthesis of MgO-Modified Biochars for Phosphorus Removal from Wastewater.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jens KruseSoil Science, Faculty for Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Rostock Justus-von-Liebig Weg 6, 18051 Rostock, Germany ; Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, Soil Science and Soil Ecology, University of Bonn Nussallee 13, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Marion AbrahamLeibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Seestraße 15, 18119 Rostock, Germany.
Wulf AmelungInstitute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, Soil Science and Soil Ecology, University of Bonn Nussallee 13, 53115 Bonn, Germany ; Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institute of Bio- and Geosciences IBG-3: Agrosphere, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
Christel BaumSoil Science, Faculty for Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Rostock Justus-von-Liebig Weg 6, 18051 Rostock, Germany.
Roland BolForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institute of Bio- and Geosciences IBG-3: Agrosphere, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
Oliver KühnInstitute of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Rostock Wismarsche Straße 43-45,18057 Rostock, Germany.
Hans LewandowskiForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institute of Bio- and Geosciences IBG-3: Agrosphere, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
Jörg NiederbergerChair of Silviculture, Albert Ludwig University Freiburg Tennenbacherstraße 4, 79085 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Yvonne OelmannGeoecology, Geosciences, University of Tübingen Rümelinstraße 19-23.72070 Tübingen, Germany.
Christopher RügerAnalytical Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Rostock Dr.-Lorenzweg 1, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
Jakob SantnerInstitute of Soil Research, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna Konrad Lorenz-Straße 24, 3430 Tulln an der Donau, Austria.
Meike SiebersInstitute of Molecular Physiology and Biotechnology of Plants, University of Bonn Karlrobert-Kreiten-Str. 13, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Nina SiebersForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institute of Bio- and Geosciences IBG-3: Agrosphere, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
Marie SpohnDepartment of Soil Ecology, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University Bayreuth Dr.-Hans-Frisch-Str. 1-3, 95448 Bayreuth, Germany.
Johan VestergrenChemistry, Umeå University, Kemi A, plan 4, Linnaeus väg 10 Umeå, Sweden.
Angela VogtsLeibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Seestraße 15, 18119 Rostock, Germany.
Peter LeinweberSoil Science, Faculty for Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Rostock Justus-von-Liebig Weg 6, 18051 Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is an indispensable element for all life on Earth and, during the past decade, concerns about the future of its global supply have stimulated much research on soil P and method development. This review provides an overview of advanced state-of-the-art methods currently used in soil P research. These involve bulk and spatially resolved spectroscopic and spectrometric P speciation methods (1 and 2D NMR, IR, Raman, Q-TOF MS/MS, high resolution-MS, NanoSIMS, XRF, XPS, (µ)XAS) as well as methods for assessing soil P reactions (sorption isotherms, quantum-chemical modeling, microbial biomass P, enzymes activity, DGT,

Indexed as

nutrient cyclingphosphatesoil chemistryspeciationspectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID26167132
PMCPMC4497464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.