Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26166537›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2015

Noninvasive Imaging of Nanomedicines and Nanotheranostics: Principles, Progress, and Prospects.

Sijumon Kunjachan, Josef Ehling, Gert Storm, Fabian Kiessling, Twan Lammers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Design, build and test of a targeted synthetic protein strategy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Advancing glioblastoma therapy with surface-modified nanoparticles.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. State of the art in pediatric nanomedicines.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Internalization of Pegylated Er:YACS applied nano materials · 2023
    Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sijumon KunjachanDepartment of Nanomedicines and Theranostics, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging (ExMI), University Clinic and Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University , Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Josef EhlingDepartment of Nanomedicines and Theranostics, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging (ExMI), University Clinic and Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University , Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Gert StormDepartment of Targeted Therapeutics, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente , P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Fabian KiesslingDepartment of Nanomedicines and Theranostics, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging (ExMI), University Clinic and Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University , Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Twan LammersDepartment of Nanomedicines and Theranostics, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging (ExMI), University Clinic and Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University , Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

Funding

European Research Council 309495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Molecular ImagingNanomedicineTheranostic NanomedicineAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID26166537
PMCPMC4610064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.