Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26166130›Full record

ArticleMedicine2015

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Monodrug Therapies for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Network Meta-analysis.

Jin-Qiu Yuan, Chen Mao, Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong, Zu-Yao Yang, Xiao-Hong Fu, Xiao-Yu Dai, Jin-Ling Tang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06212453 (Evaluation of the Functional Outcomes After Bilateral, 3D Ultrasound-guided Focal Thermal Ablation of the Prostate Transition Zone, in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia-related Obstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06212453 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Functional Outcomes After Bilateral, 3D Ultrasound-guided Focal Thermal Ablation of the Prostate Transition Zone, in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia-related Obstruction

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2024 to 2026Enrolled22ConditionsBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaArmsTargeted Microwave Ablation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Nutrients · 2024
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Efficacy ofThe world journal of men's health · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Prostate international · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jin-Qiu YuanFrom the Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Primary Care (JY, CM, ZY, XF, JT); Department of Community and Family Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (SW); Shenzhen Municipal Key Laboratory for Health Risk Analysis, Shenzhen Research Institute of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province (JY, CM, ZY, XF, JT); and Kidney Internal Medical Department, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China (XD).
Chen Mao
Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong
Zu-Yao Yang
Xiao-Hong Fu
Xiao-Yu Dai
Jin-Ling Tang
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A wide array of drugs are available for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but the evidence for the comparative effectiveness is controversial.The objective of this study is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of monodrug therapies for BPH.Data sources are MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library.We included randomized controlled trials that compared α-blockers, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARIs), muscarinic receptor antagonists (MRAs), phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5-Is), or placebo for the treatment of BPH.Comparative effectiveness and safety were pooled by both traditional meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. Summary effect size was calculated as mean difference (MD) and relative risk (RR), together with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs).This study included 58,548 participants from 124 trials in total. When compared with placebo, α-blockers, 5ARIs, and PDE5-Is reduced International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) by -1.35 to -3.67 points and increased peak urinary flow rate (PUF) by -0.02 to 1.95 mL/s, with doxazosin (IPSS: MD, -3.67[-4.33 to -3.02]; PUF: MD, 1.95[1.61 to 2.30]) and terazosin (IPSS: MD, -3.37 [-4.24 to -2.50]; PUF: MD, 1.21[0.74 to 1.66]) showing the greatest improvement. The improvement in the IPSS was comparable among tamsulosin, alfuzosin, naftopidil, silodosin, dutasteride, sildenafil, vardenafil, and tadalafil. The incidence of total adverse events and withdraws due to adverse events were generally comparable among various agents.In conclusion, α-blockers, 5ARIs, and PDE5-Is are effective for BPH, with doxazosin and terazosin appearing to be the most effective agents. Drug therapies for BPH are generally safe and well-tolerated, with no major difference regarding the overall safety profile.

Indexed as

5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsAdrenergic alpha-AntagonistsComparative Effectiveness ResearchHumansMaleMuscarinic AntagonistsPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsProstatic HyperplasiaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUrination5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsAdrenergic alpha-AntagonistsMuscarinic AntagonistsPhosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID26166130
PMCPMC4504542
OpenAlexW1158428179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.