Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26166079›Full record

ArticleMedicine2015

The Prognostic Ability of Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Ching-Chih Lee, Hsu-Chueh Ho, Yu-Chieh Su, Moon-Sing Lee, Shih-Kai Hung, Yen-Lin Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ching-Chih LeeFrom the Department of Otolaryngology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan (C-CL, H-CH); School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualian, Taiwan (C-CL, H-CH, Y-CS, M-SL, S-KH); Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan (Y-CS); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan (M-SL, S-KH); and Department of Pathology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan (Y-LC).
Hsu-Chueh Ho
Yu-Chieh Su
Moon-Sing Lee
Shih-Kai Hung
Yen-Lin Chen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) was proven a better prediction of outcomes than other methods in gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, and colon cancer. However, the validity is not yet tested in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We conducted a retrospective study to compare the predictive ability of LODDS, traditional pN classification and lymph node ratio (rN) in OSCC patients.In total, 347 OSCC patients receiving surgery with or without adjuvant therapy at the time of diagnosis between 2004 and 2013 were identified from the cancer registry database of the Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the disease-specific survival (DSS) rates for pN, rN, and LODDS after adjusting for possible confounding risk factors. The discriminatory ability of different classification systems was evaluated using the adjusted hazard ratio and Akaike information criterion (AIC) by multivariate regression model. The prediction accuracy of the model was assessed by Harrell's c-statistic.The 347 OSCC patients had a mean age of 57 years old. Among them, 322 patients (92.8%) were male and 189 patients (54.5%) were in stages III to IV. LODDS showed better discriminatory ability for patients with <5 pathological cervical metastatic nodes and those with rN < 0.2. The hypothetical T-LODDS-M staging system had higher linear trend Chi-square, lower AIC, and higher prediction accuracy compared with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM, or hypothetical T-rN-M system. After adjusting for other factors, the LODDS unfavorable group had the highest adjusted hazard ratio (HR, 5.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.19-9.12) and LODDS-based model lowest AIC of 704, comparing with pN and rN-based model. The LODDS-based system had the highest prediction accuracy for 3-year DSS (Harrell's c-statistic, 0.803).In our series, LODDS shows great promise as a prognostic tool for OSCC. Compared with the AJCC pN classification and the rN classification, LODDS can stratify OSCC patients and help to identify high-risk patients missed by the other systems.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedMouth NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26166079
PMCPMC4504633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.