Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26165865›Full record

Trial reportBMC complementary and alternative medicine2015

Immediate changes in electroencephalography activity in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain after cranial osteopathic manipulative treatment: study protocol of a randomized, controlled crossover trial.

Wagner Rodrigues Martins, Leonardo Rios Diniz, Juscelino Castro Blasczyk, Karina Ferreira Lagoa, Sérgio Thomaz, Marcia Elisabeth Rodrigues, Ricardo Jacó de Oliveira, Ana Clara Bonini-Rocha

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02111382 (Electroencephalography Activity in Individuals With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain After Cranial Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02111382 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Electroencephalography Activity in Individuals With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain After Cranial Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: Study Protocol of a Randomized, Controlled Crossover Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BrasiliaRan2018 to 2018Enrolled0ConditionsLow Back PainArmsCV4 Cranial (4th ventricle technique) Osteopathic Manipulative, CV4 (4th ventricle technique) manual therapy sham technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wagner Rodrigues MartinsCollege of Physical Therapy, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brasil. wagnermartins@unb.com.
Leonardo Rios DinizBrazilian Institute of Osteopathic, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. lrdiniz@gmail.com.
Juscelino Castro BlasczykBrazilian Institute of Osteopathic, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. juscelinocastro@gmail.com.
Karina Ferreira LagoaBrazilian Institute of Osteopathic, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Karinalagoa@gmail.com.
Sérgio ThomazCollege of Physical Therapy, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brasil. srthomaz@yahoo.com.br.
Marcia Elisabeth RodriguesBrazilian Institute of Osteopathic, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. osteopatiamarcia@gmail.com.
Ricardo Jacó de OliveiraFaculty of Physical Education, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil. rjaco@unb.br.
Ana Clara Bonini-RochaCollege of Physical Therapy, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brasil. anaclara@unb.br.
Instituto Brasileiro de Osteopatia · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteopathic medicine is based on a diagnostic and therapeutic system to treat tissue mobility/ motility dysfunctions in general, using different approaches (depending on the target tissue) known as osteopathic manipulative treatment. Among the available techniques those ones addressed to the cranial field are the most questioned because of the lack of scientific evidence; but the compression of the 4th ventricle technique has been largely studied in clinical trials. Studies have shown that the technique may affect both central and autonomous nervous system, modulating some reflexes (Traube-Hering baro signal), and modifying brain cortex electrical activity through central sensitization in subjects with chronic low back pain. Thus, investigators hypothesize that the compression of the 4th ventricle may modulate peak alpha frequency (eletroencephalographic assessment) and promote physical relaxation in subjects in vigil. METHODS/

designA randomized, controlled crossover trial with blinded assessor was designed to test the hypothesis. A total of 81 participants will be assigned to three treatment conditions, with seven days of washout: (I) compression of the 4th ventricle; (II) sham compression of the fourth ventricle; (III) control (no intervention). The (I) power amplitude and the (II) frequencies of the dominant peak in the alpha band will be the primary outcome measures of the study. All participants will be recruited at the Outpatient Rehabilitation Service of the University Hospital of Brasília-University of Brasília. All the electroencephalographic exams will be conducted by a blinded assessor. DISCUSSION: The investigators hypothesize that patients with chronic low back pain submitted to the technique would have the peak alpha frequency modulated and, thus, would experience physical relaxation.

trial registrationNCT02111382.

Indexed as

Manipulation, OsteopathicAdultClinical ProtocolsCross-Over StudiesElectroencephalographyFemaleHeadHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26165865
PMCPMC4499448
OpenAlexW1572880792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.