Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26165848›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug delivery2015

Formulation approaches to pediatric oral drug delivery: benefits and limitations of current platforms.

Felipe L Lopez, Terry B Ernest, Catherine Tuleu, Mine Orlu Gul

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug delivery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
32.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 253 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felipe L Lopeza 1 University College London, School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutics , 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK felipe.lopez.13@ucl.ac.uk.
Terry B Ernestb 2 GlaxoSmithKline, Product Development , New Frontiers Science Park, Third Avenue, Harlow, Essex CM19 5AW, UK.
Catherine Tuleua 1 University College London, School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutics , 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK felipe.lopez.13@ucl.ac.uk.
Mine Orlu Gula 1 University College London, School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutics , 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK felipe.lopez.13@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMost conventional drug delivery systems are not acceptable for pediatric patients as they differ in their developmental status and dosing requirements from other subsets of the population. Technology platforms are required to aid the development of age-appropriate medicines to maximize patient acceptability while maintaining safety, efficacy, accessibility and affordability. AREAS COVERED: The current approaches and novel developments in the field of age-appropriate drug delivery for pediatric patients are critically discussed including patient-centric formulations, administration devices and packaging systems. EXPERT OPINION: Despite the incentives provided by recent regulatory modifications and the efforts of formulation scientists, there is still a need for implementation of pharmaceutical technologies that enable the manufacture of licensed age-appropriate formulations. Harmonization of endeavors from regulators, industry and academia by sharing learning associated with data obtained from pediatric investigation plans, product development pathways and scientific projects would be the way forward to speed up bench-to-market age appropriate formulation development. A collaborative approach will benefit not only pediatrics, but other patient populations such as geriatrics would also benefit from an accelerated patient-centric approach to drug delivery.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsChemistry, PharmaceuticalChildHumansPediatricsPharmaceutical PreparationsTechnology, PharmaceuticalPharmaceutical Preparationsacceptabilityage-appropriateformulation developmentoral drug delivery systempediatric drug deliverytechnology platform

Identifiers

PMID26165848
PMCPMC4673516
OpenAlexW1871553254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.